Literature DB >> 10408484

Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.

C I Henschke1, D I McCauley, D F Yankelevitz, D P Naidich, G McGuinness, O S Miettinen, D M Libby, M W Pasmantier, J Koizumi, N K Altorki, J P Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Early Lung Cancer Action Project (ELCAP) is designed to evaluate baseline and annual repeat screening by low-radiation-dose computed tomography (low-dose CT) in people at high risk of lung cancer. We report the baseline experience.
METHODS: ELCAP has enrolled 1000 symptom-free volunteers, aged 60 years or older, with at least 10 pack-years of cigarette smoking and no previous cancer, who were medically fit to undergo thoracic surgery. After a structured interview and informed consent, chest radiographs and low-dose CT were done for each participant. The diagnostic investigation of screen-detected non-calcified pulmonary nodules was guided by ELCAP recommendations, which included short-term high-resolution CT follow-up for the smallest non-calcified nodules.
FINDINGS: Non-calcified nodules were detected in 233 (23% [95% CI 21-26]) participants by low-dose CT at baseline, compared with 68 (7% [5-9]) by chest radiography. Malignant disease was detected in 27 (2.7% [1.8-3.8]) by CT and seven (0.7% [0.3-1.3]) by chest radiography, and stage I malignant disease in 23 (2.3% [1.5-3.3]) and four (0.4% [0.1-0.9]), respectively. Of the 27 CT-detected cancers, 26 were resectable. Biopsies were done on 28 of the 233 participants with non-calcified nodules; 27 had malignant non-calcified nodules and one had a benign nodule. Another three individuals underwent biopsy against the ELCAP recommendations; all had benign non-calcified nodules. No participant had thoracotomy for a benign nodule.
INTERPRETATION: Low-dose CT can greatly improve the likelihood of detection of small non-calcified nodules, and thus of lung cancer at an earlier and potentially more curable stage. Although false-positive CT results are common, they can be managed with little use of invasive diagnostic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10408484     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06093-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  379 in total

Review 1.  Spiral computed tomography screening: study begins to determine its efficacy in lung cancer prevention.

Authors:  B S Kramer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-04

2.  Screening for lung cancer: can it be cost-effective?

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-05-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Detection of early lung cancer.

Authors:  J C Porter; S G Spiro
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Misinterpretation of the chest x ray as a factor in the delayed diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  P M Turkington; N Kennan; M A Greenstone
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Genetic testing for lung cancer risk: if physicians can do it, should they?

Authors:  Theodore W Marcy; Michael Stefanek; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Patient dose simulations for scanning-beam digital x-ray tomosynthesis of the lungs.

Authors:  Geoff Nelson; Sungwon Yoon; Ganesh Krishna; Brian Wilfley; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Implementing lung cancer screening in the real world: opportunity, challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Robert J Optican; Caroline Chiles
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

8.  Diagnostic performance of percutaneous lung biopsy using automated biopsy needles under CT-fluoroscopic guidance for ground-glass opacity lesions.

Authors:  T Yamagami; R Yoshimatsu; H Miura; K Yamada; A Takahata; T Matsumoto; T Hasebe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Lung cancer. 9: Molecular biology of lung cancer: clinical implications.

Authors:  K M Fong; Y Sekido; A F Gazdar; J D Minna
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 10.  Unleashing the power of proteomics to develop blood-based cancer markers.

Authors:  Ayumu Taguchi; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 8.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.