Literature DB >> 19956381

Computed tomography assessment of response to therapy: tumor volume change measurement, truth data, and error.

Michael F McNitt-Gray1, Luc M Bidaut, Samuel G Armato, Charles R Meyer, Marios A Gavrielides, Charles Fenimore, Geoffrey McLennan, Nicholas Petrick, Binsheng Zhao, Anthony P Reeves, Reinhard Beichel, Hyun-Jung Grace Kim, Lisa Kinnard.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: This article describes issues and methods that are specific to the measurement of change in tumor volume as measured from computed tomographic (CT) images and how these would relate to the establishment of CT tumor volumetrics as a biomarker of patient response to therapy. The primary focus is on the measurement of lung tumors, but the approach should be generalizable to other anatomic regions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The first issues addressed are the various sources of bias and variance in the measurement of tumor volumes, which are discussed in the context of measurement variation and its impact on the early detection of response to therapy. RESULTS AND RESOURCES: Research that seeks to identify the magnitude of some of these sources of error is ongoing, and several of these efforts are described herein. In addition, several resources for these investigations are being made available through the National Institutes of Health-funded Reference Image Database to Evaluate Response to therapy in cancer project, and these are described as well. Other measures derived from CT image data that might be predictive of patient response are described briefly, as well as the additional issues that each of these metrics may encounter in real-life applications.
CONCLUSIONS: The article concludes with a brief discussion of moving from the assessment of measurement variation to the steps necessary to establish the efficacy of a metric as a biomarker for response.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19956381      PMCID: PMC2781084          DOI: 10.1593/tlo.09226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1936-5233            Impact factor:   4.243


  26 in total

1.  Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation.

Authors:  D F Yankelevitz; A P Reeves; W J Kostis; B Zhao; C I Henschke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings.

Authors:  C I Henschke; D P Naidich; D F Yankelevitz; G McGuinness; D I McCauley; J P Smith; D Libby; M Pasmantier; M Vazquez; J Koizumi; D Flieder; N Altorki; O S Miettinen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology.

Authors:  Myria Petrou; Leslie E Quint; Bin Nan; Laurence H Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Evaluation of lung MDCT nodule annotation across radiologists and methods.

Authors:  Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Geoffrey McLennan; Denise R Aberle; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber Macmahon; Brian F Mullan; David F Yankelevitz; Edwin J R van Beek; Samuel G Armato; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Anthony P Reeves; David Gur; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Peyton H Bland; Gary Laderach; Richie Pais; David Qing; Chris Piker; Junfeng Guo; Adam Starkey; Daniel Max; Barbara Y Croft; Laurence P Clarke
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT.

Authors:  Marios A Gavrielides; Lisa M Kinnard; Kyle J Myers; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Pulmonary metastases: effect of CT section thickness on measurement--initial experience.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao; Lawrence H Schwartz; Chaya S Moskowitz; Liang Wang; Michelle S Ginsberg; Cathleen A Cooper; Li Jiang; John P Kalaigian
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; Thomas E Hartman; David E Midthun; Jeff A Sloan; Anne-Marie Sykes; Gregory L Aughenbaugh; Medy A Clemens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Effect of varying CT section width on volumetric measurement of lung tumors and application of compensatory equations.

Authors:  Helen T Winer-Muram; S Gregory Jennings; Cristopher A Meyer; Yun Liang; Alex M Aisen; Robert D Tarver; Ronald C McGarry
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner.

Authors:  S Sone; F Li; Z G Yang; T Honda; Y Maruyama; S Takashima; M Hasegawa; S Kawakami; K Kubo; M Haniuda; T Yamanda
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  18 in total

1.  Treatment planning and volumetric response assessment for Yttrium-90 radioembolization: semiautomated determination of liver volume and volume of tumor necrosis in patients with hepatic malignancy.

Authors:  Wayne L Monsky; Armando S Garza; Isaac Kim; Shaun Loh; Tzu-Chun Lin; Chin-Shang Li; Jerron Fisher; Parmbir Sandhu; Vishal Sidhar; Abhijit J Chaudhari; Frank Lin; Larry-Stuart Deutsch; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Quantitative imaging for evaluation of response to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Laurence P Clarke; Barbara S Croft; Robert Nordstrom; Huiming Zhang; Gary Kelloff; J Tatum
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

3.  Quantitative imaging features of pretreatment CT predict volumetric response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  John M Creasy; Abhishek Midya; Jayasree Chakraborty; Lauryn B Adams; Camilla Gomes; Mithat Gonen; Kenneth P Seastedt; Elizabeth J Sutton; Andrea Cercek; Nancy E Kemeny; Jinru Shia; Vinod P Balachandran; T Peter Kingham; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica; Richard K G Do; Amber L Simpson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Functional and molecular image guidance in radiotherapy treatment planning optimization.

Authors:  Shiva K Das; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.934

5.  Inter-Method Performance Study of Tumor Volumetry Assessment on Computed Tomography Test-Retest Data.

Authors:  Andrew J Buckler; Jovanna Danagoulian; Kjell Johnson; Adele Peskin; Marios A Gavrielides; Nicholas Petrick; Nancy A Obuchowski; Hubert Beaumont; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Rudresh Jarecha; Jan-Martin Kuhnigk; Ninad Mantri; Michael McNitt-Gray; Jan H Moltz; Gergely Nyiri; Sam Peterson; Pierre Tervé; Christian Tietjen; Etienne von Lavante; Xiaonan Ma; Samantha St Pierre; Maria Athelogou
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Reproducibility and Prognosis of Quantitative Features Extracted from CT Images.

Authors:  Yoganand Balagurunathan; Yuhua Gu; Hua Wang; Virendra Kumar; Olya Grove; Sam Hawkins; Jongphil Kim; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  PET/CT Assessment of Response to Therapy: Tumor Change Measurement, Truth Data, and Error.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Robert K Doot; Michelle Wanner-Roybal; Luc M Bidaut; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Geoffrey McLennan
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Quantitative imaging to assess tumor response to therapy: common themes of measurement, truth data, and error sources.

Authors:  Charles R Meyer; Samuel G Armato; Charles P Fenimore; Geoffrey McLennan; Luc M Bidaut; Daniel P Barboriak; Marios A Gavrielides; Edward F Jackson; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Paul E Kinahan; Nicholas Petrick; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources.

Authors:  Edward F Jackson; Daniel P Barboriak; Luc M Bidaut; Charles R Meyer
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  A New Approach to Evaluate Drug Treatment Response of Ovarian Cancer Patients Based on Deformable Image Registration.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Zheng Li; Yuchen Qiu; Scott D McMeekin; Theresa C Thai; Kai Ding; Kathleen N Moore; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.