Literature DB >> 8394199

Screening for lung cancer. The Mayo Lung Project revisited.

B J Flehinger1, M Kimmel, T Polyak, M R Melamed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Mayo Lung Project (MLP) reported lung cancer incidence and mortality in a population offered chest radiographs and sputum cytologic screening examinations every 4 months and a population offered only the Mayo Clinic advice to undergo annual examination. No mortality benefit attributable to screening was observed after 6 years of observation and at least 1 year of follow-up.
METHODS: The authors describe a simulation study designed to estimate from Mayo data the parameters in a mathematical model of the natural history of lung cancer and to estimate the potential benefit associated with periodic screening of high-risk people starting at 45 years of age.
RESULTS: It was found that the mean duration of Stage I non-small cell lung cancer is at least 4 years and that rates of Stage I detectability and curability are less than 25% and 35%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A trial of the magnitude, duration, and contamination of the MLP would have a less than 20% probability of showing significant benefit from screening; however, long-term annual screening might result in a modest decrease in lung cancer mortality, ranging from 0% to 13%. A greater benefit would accrue from improved detection and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8394199     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930901)72:5<1573::aid-cncr2820720514>3.0.co;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  20 in total

Review 1.  Detection of early lung cancer.

Authors:  J C Porter; S G Spiro
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Confounding by dietary factors in case-control studies on the efficacy of cancer screening in Japan.

Authors:  Ko-Jun Suzuki; Shigeyuki Nakaji; Shoji Tokunaga; Tadashi Shimoyama; Takashi Umeda; Kazuo Sugawara
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Genetic polymorphism of the CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes and lung cancer susceptibility in a north indian population.

Authors:  R C Sobti; S Sharma; A Joshi; S K Jindal; A Janmeja
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 4.  Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Amy B Knudsen; Chung Yin Kong; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Delays in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter M Ellis; Rachel Vandermeer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the baseline findings of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Muralikrishna Gopal; Shaad E Abdullah; James J Grady; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 7.  Screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Renée Manser; Anne Lethaby; Louis B Irving; Christine Stone; Graham Byrnes; Michael J Abramson; Don Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-21

8.  Computer-aided nodule detection on digital chest radiography: validation test on consecutive T1 cases of resectable lung cancer.

Authors:  Shuji Sakai; Hiroyasu Soeda; Naoki Takahashi; Takashi Okafuji; Tadamasa Yoshitake; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Ichiro Yoshino; Keiji Yamamoto; Hiroshi Honda; Kunio Doi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  [Bronchial carcinoma. Epidemiology, diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  H N Macha
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 10.  Screening and chemoprevention in lung cancer.

Authors:  J M Gasent Blesa; E Esteban González; V Alberola Candel
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.