Literature DB >> 11112187

The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years.

S W Wachtl1, M Jung, R P Jakob, E Gautier.   

Abstract

A total of 38 acetabular revisions using a Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in 37 patients (18 women and 19 men), with a mean age at surgery of 75 years (range, 55-88 years), were evaluated retrospectively with a mean follow-up of 12 years (range, 8-21 years). In 2 cases with total hip dislocation and in 1 case with a deep infection, revision of the antiprotrusio cages was required. Defining every revision of the antiprotrusio cage as the endpoint of survivorship, the antiprotrusio cage showed a survival rate of 92% after 21 years. Clinical evaluation of the surviving patients showed a mean Harris hip score of 76 points (range, 20-96). Radiologic evaluation revealed that 1 antiprotrusio cage was loose and that 4 femoral stems were loose. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage compares favorably with other devices with regard to long-term implant survival rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11112187     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.17942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  M Villanueva; A Rios-Luna; J Pereiro De Lamo; H Fahandez-Saddi; M P G Böstrom
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-07-15

Review 3.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Exchange of acetabular cups with severe bone defects using antiprotrusion cages].

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexandra Grossmann; Pavel Sebena
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 5.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

6.  Surgical technique: a cup-in-cup technique to restore offset in severe protrusio acetabular defects.

Authors:  Thomas J Blumenfeld; William L Bargar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Trabecular titanium cups in acetabular revision arthroplasty: analysis of 10-year survivorship, restoration of center of rotation and osteointegration.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi Lepri; Matteo Innocenti; Alberto Galeotti; Christian Carulli; Marco Villano; Roberto Civinini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.928

8.  [Acetabular revision surgery with the oblong revision cup : clinical and radiological results of 217 cases].

Authors:  S Fickert; S Pfeiffer; A Walter; K P Günther; W-C Witzleb
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Salvage of failed acetabular cages by nonbuttressed trabecular metal cups.

Authors:  Yona Kosashvili; Oleg Safir; David Backstein; Dror Lakstein; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  10-Year Survival of Acetabular Reinforcement Rings/Cages for Complex Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander Ewers; Christian Spross; Lukas Ebneter; Fabrice Külling; Karlmeinrad Giesinger; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Johannes Erhardt
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.