Literature DB >> 34782910

Trabecular titanium cups in acetabular revision arthroplasty: analysis of 10-year survivorship, restoration of center of rotation and osteointegration.

Andrea Cozzi Lepri1, Matteo Innocenti2, Alberto Galeotti2, Christian Carulli2, Marco Villano2, Roberto Civinini2.   

Abstract

AIMS: In case of severe bone loss, acetabular revision can be challenged using extra porous pure trabecular titanium (TT) revision cups designed to ensure enhanced iliac and ischiatic purchase. Aim of the study is to report on the clinical and radiological results of a TT acetabular component, evaluating functional outcome, restoration of the hip center of rotation and osteointegration.
METHODS: 85 patients, who underwent acetabular revision with a TT revision cup system between October 2009 and December 2018, were included in a retrospective study. Clinical outcome were assessed with Harris Hip Score (HHS). The hip rotation center was measured using the Pierchon method on the AP pelvis film. Loosening of the cup was determined according to the Kosashvili modification of Gill's criteria. Kaplan- Meier survivorship curve was performed. Results The mean follow-up was 6.12 years. The average HHS improved from 54.7 points to 89.7 points (p < 0.05). Two acetabular components (2.3%) were re-revised after a mean of 5.6 years, for aseptic loosening and for infection, with a progressive radiolucency and a > 5 mm vertical migration, respectively. The radiographic evaluation of the position of the hip rotation center revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the pre- and post-operative values. The hip rotation center was correctly restored within 5% of the reference Pierchon values in a percentage of 85.4% relative to horizontal parameters and within 8% in a percentage of 66.7% relative to vertical parameters. 5-year and 10-year survivorships were, respectively, 100% and 88%.
CONCLUSIONS: In case of severe bone loss, TT revision cup system allows for good restoration of center of rotation and osteointegration showing good 10-year survival rate.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone loss; Center of rotation; Osteointegration; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Trabecular titanium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34782910     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04243-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   2.928


  33 in total

1.  The management of severe acetabular bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices.

Authors:  T J Gill; J B Sledge; M E Müller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Assessment and classification of bone stock deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wayne G Paprosky; R Stephen J Burnett
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-08

3.  The Müller acetabular reinforcement ring--still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years.

Authors:  C Kösters; B Schliemann; D Decking; U Simon; M Zurstegge; J Decking
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.500

4.  Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; John L Masonis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants.

Authors:  Boris Steno; Milan Kokavec; Libor Necas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years.

Authors:  S W Wachtl; M Jung; R P Jakob; E Gautier
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Atul F Kamath; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Steve Kurtz; Vanessa Chan; Thomas P Vail; Harry Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Trabecular TitaniumTM cups and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results, radiology and survival outcomes.

Authors:  Xavier Gallart; Jenaro A Fernández-Valencia; Josep Riba; Guillem Bori; Sebastián García; Eduard Tornero; Andreu Combalía
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.