Literature DB >> 18815856

A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.

M Villanueva1, A Rios-Luna, J Pereiro De Lamo, H Fahandez-Saddi, M P G Böstrom.   

Abstract

Pelvic discontinuity is a complex entity with a high surgical complication rate and no standardized treatment to date. Revision hip arthroplasty in cases of massive bone loss remains a difficult and unsolved problem. The goal of the surgeon is to preserve limb function by restoring bone stock and the biomechanics of the hip. In cases of severe acetabular bone loss, biologic fixation is often inadequate, requiring extensive bone grafting and reconstructive cages. Reconstructive cages are the most commonly used devices and are designed to bridge bone defects, protect the bone graft, and reestablish the rotation center of the hip. A major limitation of current cages is that they do not allow for biologic fixation. We review the options for treating patients with massive bone loss and pelvic discontinuity and discuss therapeutic options and the clinical and radiological criteria for success.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18815856      PMCID: PMC2553162          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-008-9075-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  51 in total

1.  Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results.

Authors:  M J Christie; S A Barrington; M F Brinson; M E Ruhling; D K DeBoer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Use of structural allografts in acetabular revision surgery.

Authors:  Michael R O'Rourke; Wayne G Paprosky; Aaron G Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Acetabular revision with a modular anti-protrusio acetabular component.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Michael Miller; Jill Erickson; Perry Hall; Kent Samuelson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Role and results of the high hip center.

Authors:  M Tanzer
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  The use of osteogenic protein-1 in reconstructive surgery of the hip.

Authors:  S D Cook; R L Barrack; A Shimmin; D Morgan; J P Carvajal
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The Bürch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results.

Authors:  T J Gill; J B Sledge; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-11

9.  Fixation using acetabular reconstruction cage and cancellous allografts for intraoperative acetabular fractures associated with cementless acetabular component insertion.

Authors:  Pat Shui Ko; Wai Fu Chan; Man Kwan Wong; Man Fai Leung; On Bong Lee; James Joseph Lam
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency.

Authors:  D Garbuz; E Morsi; N Mohamed; A E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

2.  The use of a triflange salvage system for catastrophic pelvic osteolysis after failed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew A Siegel; Michael J Patetta; Jason Y Chen; Diego M Barragan Echenique; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-02

3.  Three-Dimensional Models in Planning of Revision Hip Arthroplasty with Complex Acetabular Defects.

Authors:  Gennadiy M Kavalerskiy; Valeriy Y Murylev; Yaroslav A Rukin; Pavel M Elizarov; Alexey V Lychagin; Evgeniya Y Tselisheva
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Staged Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Novel Technique in Managing Native and Periprosthetic Acetabular Insufficiency.

Authors:  John V Horberg; J Ross Bailey; Kathleen Kay; D Gordon Allan
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-05-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.