Literature DB >> 12219893

How does background information improve memory for text content?

Katherine A Rawson1, Walter Kintsch.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated whether reading background information benefits memory for text content by influencing the amount of content encoded or the organization of the encoded content. In Experiment 1, half of the participants read background information about the issues to be discussed in the text material, whereas half did not. All the participants were then tested for free recall and cued recall of text content. Free recall was greater for individuals who read issue information than for those who did not. The groups did not differ on cued recall, suggesting that background information did not facilitate the encoding of more text content. Measures of representational organization indicated that increased recall in the issue information group resulted from better organization of content in memory. Experiment 2 extended these findings, using background information about text sources, demonstrated that the efficacy of background information depends on the semantic relationship between that information and text content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12219893     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  6 in total

1.  Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  J Wiley; K Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

2.  The category access measure of relational processing.

Authors:  D J Burns; C A Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Mental models and the fan effect.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; R T Zacks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts.

Authors:  K K Millis; S Simon; N S tenBroek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-03

5.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model.

Authors:  W Kintsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Text comprehension, memory, and learning.

Authors:  W Kintsch
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1994-04
  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Classroom Interpreting and Visual Information Processing in Mainstream Education for Deaf Students: Live or Memorex?

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Jeff B Pelz; Carol Convertino; Patricia Sapere; Mary Ellen Arndt; Rosemarie Seewagen
Journal:  Am Educ Res J       Date:  2005

2.  Contextual knowledge reduces demands on working memory during reading.

Authors:  Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Jason A Cohen; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

3.  Acquiring Science and Social Studies Knowledge in Kindergarten Through Fourth Grade: Conceptualization, Design, Implementation, and Efficacy Testing of Content-Area Literacy Instruction (CALI).

Authors:  Jennifer Dombek; Elizabeth C Crowe; Mercedes Spencer; Elizabeth L Tighe; Sean Coffinger; Elham Zargar; Taffeta Wood; Yaacov Petscher
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2016-09-12

4.  Vocabulary Knowledge of Deaf and Hearing Postsecondary Students.

Authors:  Thomastine Sarchet; Marc Marschark; Georgianna Borgna; Carol Convertino; Patricia Sapere; Richard Dirmyer
Journal:  J Postsecond Educ Disabil       Date:  2014

5.  Simultaneous Communication and Cochlear Implants in the Classroom?

Authors:  Helen C Blom; Marc Marschark
Journal:  Deafness Educ Int       Date:  2015-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.