Literature DB >> 17225514

Contextual knowledge reduces demands on working memory during reading.

Lisa M Soederberg Miller1, Jason A Cohen, Arthur Wingfield.   

Abstract

An experiment is reported in which young, middle-aged, and older adults read and recalled ambiguous texts either with or without the topic title that supplied contextual knowledge. Within each of the age groups, the participants were divided into those with high or low working memory (WM) spans, with available WM capacity further manipulated by the presence or absence of an auditory target detection task concurrent with the reading task. Differences in reading efficiency (reading time per proposition recalled) between low WM span and high WM span groups were greater among readers who had access to contextual knowledge relative to those who did not, suggesting that contextual knowledge reduces demands on WM capacity. This position was further supported by the finding that increased age and attentional demands, two factors associated with reduced WM capacity, exaggerated the benefits of contextual knowledge on reading efficiency. The relative strengths of additional potential predictors of reading efficiency (e.g., interest, effort, and memory beliefs), along with knowledge, WM span, and age, are reported. Findings showed that contextual knowledge was the strongest predictor of reading efficiency even after controlling for the effects of all of the other predictors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17225514      PMCID: PMC2812925          DOI: 10.3758/bf03193277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Working memory capacity and strategy use.

Authors:  D S McNamara; J L Scott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye fixations in expository text.

Authors:  Johanna K Kaakinen; Jukka Hyönä; Janice M Keenan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  How does background information improve memory for text content?

Authors:  Katherine A Rawson; Walter Kintsch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

Review 4.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Probe-detection times during the reading of easy and difficult text.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Fleming
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Roles of working memory capacity and long-term working memory skill in complex task performance.

Authors:  Young Woo Sohn; Stephanie M Doane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

7.  Adult age differences in memory in relation to availability and accessibility of knowledge-based schemas.

Authors:  T Y Arbuckle; V F Vanderleck; M Harsany; S Lapidus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Does the capacity of working memory change with age?

Authors:  A Wingfield; E A Stine; C J Lahar; J S Aberdeen
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1988 Summer-Autumn       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 9.  Long-term working memory.

Authors:  K A Ericsson; W Kintsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  An ecological theory of expertise effects in memory recall.

Authors:  K J Vicente; J H Wang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  15 in total

1.  The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficiency and reserve.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Xuefei Gao; Soo Rim Noh; Carolyn J Anderson; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2011-12-08

2.  Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; David M Groppe; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 3.  Aging and self-regulated language processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Adult age differences in the effects of goals on self-regulated sentence processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Matthew C Shake; Joseph R Miles; Soo Rim Noh
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-12

5.  The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy.

Authors:  Thomas D Griffin; Benjamin D Jee; Jennifer Wiley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

6.  Does semantic knowledge influence event segmentation and recall of text?

Authors:  Kimberly M Newberry; Heather R Bailey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

7.  The effect of plausibility on sentence comprehension among older adults and its relation to cognitive functions.

Authors:  Jungmee Yoon; Luca Campanelli; Mira Goral; Klara Marton; Naomi Eichorn; Loraine K Obler
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.645

8.  Age differences in the effects of domain knowledge on reading efficiency.

Authors:  Lisa M Soederberg Miller
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-03

9.  The effects of age, control beliefs, and feedback on self-regulation of reading and problem solving.

Authors:  Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Robin L West
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.645

10.  Age differences in the effects of conceptual integration training on resource allocation in sentence processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Soo Rim Noh; Matthew C Shake
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.