Literature DB >> 11089718

Using the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio to detect prostate cancer in men with nonspecific elevations of prostate-specific antigen levels.

R M Hoffman1, D L Clanon, B Littenberg, J J Frank, J C Peirce.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels between 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml have poor specificity in prostate cancer screening, leading to unnecessary biopsies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the free-to-total PSA ratio (F/T PSA) improved the diagnostic accuracy of these nonspecific PSA levels.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: MEDLINE searchedwas from 1986 to 1997. Additional studies were identified from article bibliographies and by searching urology journals. Two investigators independently identified English-language studies providing F/T PSA ratio test-operating characteristics data on > or = 10 cancer patients with PSA values between 2.0 and 10.0 ng/ml. Twenty-one of 90 retrieved studies met selection criteria. Two investigators independently extracted data on methodology and diagnostic performance. Investigator-selected cut points for the optimal F/T PSA ratio had a median likelihood ratio of 1.76 (interquartile range, 1.40 to 2.11) for a positive test and 0.27 (0.20 to 0.40) for a negative test. Assuming a 25% pretest probability of cancer, the posttest probabilities were 37% following a positive test and 8% following a negative test. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve showed that maintaining test sensitivity above 90% was associated with false positive rates of 60% to 90%. Methodologic problems limited the validity and generalizability of the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: A negative test reduced the posttest probability of cancer to approximately 10%. However, patients may find that this probability is not low enough to avoid undergoing prostate biopsy. The optimal F/T PSA ratio cut point and precise estimates for test specificity still need to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11089718      PMCID: PMC1495603          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.90907.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  93 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for prostate cancer.

Authors:  K J Pienta; P S Esper
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method.

Authors:  B Littenberg; L E Moses
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations.

Authors:  L E Moses; D Shapiro; B Littenberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Integrating stratum-specific likelihood ratios with the analysis of ROC curves.

Authors:  J C Peirce; R G Cornell
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Analytical performance and clinical validity of two free prostate-specific antigen assays compared.

Authors:  K Jung; C Stephan; M Lein; W Henke; D Schnorr; B Brux; P Schürenkämper; S A Loening
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Serum prostate specific antigen complexed to alpha 1-antichymotrypsin as an indicator of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Christensson; T Björk; O Nilsson; U Dahlén; M T Matikainen; A T Cockett; P A Abrahamsson; H Lilja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges.

Authors:  J E Oesterling; S J Jacobsen; C G Chute; H A Guess; C J Girman; L A Panser; M M Lieber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Double-label time-resolved immunofluorometric assay of prostate-specific antigen and of its complex with alpha 1-antichymotrypsin.

Authors:  J Leinonen; T Lövgren; T Vornanen; U H Stenman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Measurement of prostate specific antigen and gamma-seminoprotein ratio: a new means of distinguishing benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer.

Authors:  T Demura; Y Watarai; M Togashi; T Hirano; N Ohashi; T Koyanagi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prevalence and pathological extent of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen levels of 2.9 to 4.0 ng./ml.

Authors:  J W Colberg; D S Smith; W J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  11 in total

1.  Brief report: Free prostate-specific antigen test utilization. Consistency with guidelines.

Authors:  Brian R Jackson; William L Roberts
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Variation of a test's sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence.

Authors:  Mariska M G Leeflang; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Lotty Hooft; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Prostate cancer: epidemiology and screening.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

4.  Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography: a meta-analysis for this diagnostic triad of prostate cancer in symptomatic korean men.

Authors:  Jae Mann Song; Chun Bae Kim; Hyun Chul Chung; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  A Review on the Clinical Utility of PSA in Cancer Prostate.

Authors:  Mohan Adhyam; Anish Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-03

6.  Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Marcello Di Nisio; Nynke Smidt; Jeroen C van Rijn; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  An evaluation of common methods for dichotomization of continuous variables to discriminate disease status.

Authors:  Sybil L Prince Nelson; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Paul J Nietert; Diane L Kamen; Paula S Ramos; Bethany J Wolf
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 0.893

8.  Obesity inversely correlates with prostate-specific antigen levels in a population with normal screening results of prostate cancer in northwestern China.

Authors:  J Zhang; M Ma; X Nan; B Sheng
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.590

Review 9.  Cost analysis of screening for, diagnosing, and staging prostate cancer based on a systematic review of published studies.

Authors:  Donatus U Ekwueme; Leonardo A Stroud; Yanjing Chen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Phase analysis single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) detects dyssynchrony in myocardial scar and increases specificity of MPI.

Authors:  John P Bois; Chris Scott; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Raymond J Gibbons; Martin Rodriguez-Porcel
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.