Literature DB >> 29962658

An evaluation of common methods for dichotomization of continuous variables to discriminate disease status.

Sybil L Prince Nelson1, Viswanathan Ramakrishnan2, Paul J Nietert2, Diane L Kamen3, Paula S Ramos3, Bethany J Wolf4.   

Abstract

Dichotomization of continuous variables to discriminate a dichotomous outcome is often useful in statistical applications. If a true threshold for a continuous variable exists, the challenge is identifying it. This paper examines common methods for dichotomization to identify which ones recover a true threshold. We provide mathematical and numeric proofs demonstrating that maximizing the odds ratio, Youden's statistic, Gini Index, chi-square statistic, relative risk and kappa statistic all theoretically recover a true threshold. A simulation study evaluating the ability of these statistics to recover a threshold when sampling from a population indicates that maximizing the chi-square statistic and Gini Index have the smallest bias and variability when the probability of being larger than the threshold is small while maximizing Kappa or Youden's statistics is best when this probability is larger. Maximizing odds ratio is the most variable and biased of the methods.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29962658      PMCID: PMC6020169          DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2016.1248783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods        ISSN: 0361-0926            Impact factor:   0.893


  21 in total

1.  Methods for categorizing a prognostic variable in a multivariable setting.

Authors:  Madhu Mazumdar; Alex Smith; Jennifer Bacik
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A limitation of the diagnostic-odds ratio in determining an optimal cut-off value for a continuous diagnostic test.

Authors:  Dankmar Böhning; Heinz Holling; Valentin Patilea
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Analysis by categorizing or dichotomizing continuous variables is inadvisable: an example from the natural history of unruptured aneurysms.

Authors:  O Naggara; J Raymond; F Guilbert; D Roy; A Weill; D G Altman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Evaluation of cutoff levels for screening of gastric cancer using serum pepsinogens and distributions of levels of serum pepsinogen I, II and of PG I/PG II ratios in a gastric cancer case-control study.

Authors:  K Aoki; J Misumi; T Kimura; W Zhao; T Xie
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.211

7.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Two-graph receiver operating characteristic (TG-ROC): a Microsoft-EXCEL template for the selection of cut-off values in diagnostic tests.

Authors:  M Greiner
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1995-09-11       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  The ROC curve in the evaluation of fasting capillary blood glucose as a screening test for diabetes and IGT.

Authors:  A L Bortheiry; D A Malerbi; L J Franco
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Influence of age and purpose for testing on the cut-off selection of serological methods in bovine neosporosis.

Authors:  Gema Alvarez-García; Esther Collantes-Fernández; Eduardo Costas; Xabier Rebordosa; Luis Miguel Ortega-Mora
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.683

View more
  9 in total

1.  Failure to Thrive Following Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Causes and Consequences.

Authors:  Caroline J Rieser; Jurgis Alvikas; Heather Phelos; Lauren B Hall; Amer H Zureikat; Andrew Lee; Melanie Ongchin; Matthew P Holtzman; James F Pingpank; David L Bartlett; M Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Resolving the Gestational Diabetes Diagnosis Conundrum: The Need for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Treatment.

Authors:  Rudolf W Bilous; Paul B Jacklin; Michael J Maresh; David A Sacks
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 17.152

3.  Development and validation of a five-factor score for prediction of pathologic pneumatosis.

Authors:  Caroline J Rieser; Esmaeel R Dadashzadeh; Robert M Handzel; Kadie J Clancy; Christof T Kaltenmeier; J B Moses; Raquel M Forsythe; Shandong Wu; Matthew R Rosengart
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.697

4.  A novel approach to determine two optimal cut-points of a continuous predictor with a U-shaped relationship to hazard ratio in survival data: simulation and application.

Authors:  Yimin Chen; Jialing Huang; Xianying He; Yongxiang Gao; Gehendra Mahara; Zhuochen Lin; Jinxin Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Association between root/coronal caries and individual factors in institutionalised elderly using ICDAS severity and activity.

Authors:  Margarita Usuga-Vacca; Dairo Javier Marin-Zuluaga; Jaime Eduardo Castellanos; Stefania Martignon
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 6.  Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Sport Performance-Are They Equally Beneficial for Athletes and Amateurs? A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Frank Thielecke; Andrew Blannin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Predischarge Prediction of Readmission After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Derivation and Validation of a Risk Prediction Score.

Authors:  Caroline J Rieser; Lauren B Hall; Eliza Kang; Amer H Zureikat; Matthew P Holtzman; James F Pingpank; David L Bartlett; M Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Characterising the relationships between physiological indicators and all-cause mortality (NHANES): a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Vy Kim Nguyen; Justin Colacino; Ming Kei Chung; Alan Le Goallec; Olivier Jolliet; Chirag J Patel
Journal:  Lancet Healthy Longev       Date:  2021-09-20

9.  Socio-Demographic and Attitudinal Correlates of Problematic Social Media Use: Analysis of Ithra's 30-Nation Digital Wellbeing Survey.

Authors:  Justin Thomas; Marina Verlinden; Fahad Al Beyahi; Bahiah Al Bassam; Yasmin Aljedawi
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.157

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.