Literature DB >> 7679753

Prevalence and pathological extent of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen levels of 2.9 to 4.0 ng./ml.

J W Colberg1, D S Smith, W J Catalona.   

Abstract

Various authors have recommended different values for the upper limit of normal for the monoclonal prostate specific antigen (PSA) assay (for example 4.0 ng./ml. or less by the manufacturer Hybritech or 2.8 ng./ml. or less by others). To our knowledge, no studies have examined the prevalence and pathological extent of prostate cancer detectable by needle biopsy in ambulatory volunteers with PSA levels in the range of 2.9 to 4.0 ng./ml. We evaluated 121 volunteers by rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography with PSA levels in that range. We performed ultrasound-directed needle biopsy of the prostate if abnormal findings were present on either examination. The prevalence of detectable prostate cancer in this group was 7.2% (8 of 111). All 8 patients had pathologically organ confined cancer, and only 2 had suspicious findings on rectal examination but all had abnormal or suspicious ultrasound findings. We believe that the 7.2% yield from ultrasonography and biopsy in patients with a PSA level of 2.9 to 4.0 ng./ml. is too low to justify further invasive evaluation. Rather, we recommend careful followup and monitoring of these patients with serial PSA measurements and rectal examination, and advise performance of ultrasonography and biopsy if the rectal examination becomes suspicious for cancer or the PSA level increases above 4.0 ng./ml.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7679753     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36130-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Using the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio to detect prostate cancer in men with nonspecific elevations of prostate-specific antigen levels.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; D L Clanon; B Littenberg; J J Frank; J C Peirce
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Does an asymmetric lobe in digital rectal examination include any risk for prostate cancer? results of 1495 biopsies.

Authors:  Ömer Yilmaz; Özgür Kurul; Ferhat Ates; Hasan Soydan; Zeki Aktas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  [Validity of digital rectal examination in the era of prostate specific antigen].

Authors:  E Alonso-Sandoica; J Jara-Rascón; J I Martínez-Salamanca; C Hernández-Fernández
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  Is digital rectal examination still necessary in the early detection of prostate cancer?

Authors:  M R Quinlan; S Teahan; D Mulvin; D M Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Dealing with non-cancerous findings on prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Timothy C Brand; Gregory P Thibault; Joseph W Basler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.862

6.  Prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density cutoff points among Indonesian population suspected for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad Anies Shahab; Doddy M Soebadi; Wahjoe Djatisoesanto; Sunaryo Hardjowijoto; Soetojo Soetojo; Lukman Hakim
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2013-01-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.