Literature DB >> 23730101

A Review on the Clinical Utility of PSA in Cancer Prostate.

Mohan Adhyam1, Anish Kumar Gupta.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer has come to share the oncological centrestage among male cancers. The availability of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen, PSA, as a marker has encouraged it's use to diagnose both cancer and cancer recurrence. Some clarity is required about its precise role in clinical practice. The available literature on Prostate Specific Antigen was reviewed; Articles were reviewed for content, applicability to the problem at hand, availability of data about sensitivity and specificity of values, refinements in measurements and finally for impact of screening programmes using these values on survival and quality of life. The data in the literature was critically re-evaluated and analysed to draw reasonable conclusions. Serum PSA measurements show variable reliability when it comes to diagnosis of Prostate cancer, given the dynamics of PSA physiology. Surrogate measures like PSA density, PSA velocity, free-to-complexed PSA ratio, percentage Pro-PSA, etc., have been used to improve the predictive utility of this assay for Prostate cancer. The ability of PSA to detect those cancers that will cost life, and thereby permit early curative treatment, is as yet unclear. It's most definitive role appears to be in diagnosing recurrences after adequate surgical treatment, and in evaluating response to treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA); Prostate cancer; Prostate cancer diagnosis; Prostate cancer treatment

Year:  2012        PMID: 23730101      PMCID: PMC3392481          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-012-0142-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  90 in total

Review 1.  Screening for prostate cancer. American College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  T A Stamey; N Yang; A R Hay; J E McNeal; F S Freiha; E Redwine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Prostate specific antigen: a decade of discovery--what we have learned and where we are going.

Authors:  T J Polascik; J E Oesterling; A W Partin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Comparison of analysis of the different prostate-specific antigen forms in serum for detection of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  T Björk; T Piironen; K Pettersson; T Lövgren; U H Stenman; J E Oesterling; P A Abrahamsson; H Lilja
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Clinical evaluation of serum prostate-specific antigen-alpha1-antichymotrypsin complex values in diagnosis of prostate cancer: a cooperative study.

Authors:  M Kuriyama; K Ueno; H Uno; Y Kawada; S Akimoto; M Noda; Y Nasu; T Tsushima; H Ohmori; H Sakai; Y Saito; N Meguro; M Usami; T Kotake; Y Suzuki; Y Arai; J Shimazaki
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  Correlation of prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density with outcome of prostate biopsy.

Authors:  R Bare; L Hart; D L McCullough
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  The effect of digital rectal examination on the serum prostate specific antigen concentration: results of a randomized study.

Authors:  F M Chybowski; E J Bergstralh; J E Oesterling
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Screening for prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Mia Djulbegovic; Rebecca J Beyth; Molly M Neuberger; Taryn L Stoffs; Johannes Vieweg; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-09-14
View more
  33 in total

1.  Lateral flow assay ruler for quantitative and rapid point-of-care testing.

Authors:  Zhao Li; Hui Chen; Ping Wang
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.616

2.  Detection of Gastric Cancer with Novel Methylated DNA Markers: Discovery, Tissue Validation, and Pilot Testing in Plasma.

Authors:  Bradley W Anderson; Yun-Suhk Suh; Boram Choi; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Tracy C Yab; William R Taylor; Brian A Dukek; Calise K Berger; Xiaoming Cao; Patrick H Foote; Mary E Devens; Lisa A Boardman; John B Kisiel; Douglas W Mahoney; Seth W Slettedahl; Hatim T Allawi; Graham P Lidgard; Thomas C Smyrk; Han-Kwang Yang; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Blood-based microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers to discriminate localized prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia and allow cancer-risk stratification.

Authors:  Ghada Al-Kafaji; Harun Muayad Said; Mahmood Abduljalil Alam; Ziad Tarraq Al Naieb
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Differentially expressed miR-20, miR-21, miR-100, miR-125a and miR-146a as a potential biomarker for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohan Damodaran; Mohanapriya Chinambedu Dandapani; S VenkatRamanan; Ilangovan Ramachandran; Vettriselvi Venkatesan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Development of a novel five-gene immune-related risk model for the prognosis evaluation of prostate adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Hongjun Fei; Xiongming Chen
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 5.942

6.  The evaluation of prostate lesions with IVIM DWI and MR perfusion parameters at 3T MRI.

Authors:  Murat Beyhan; Recep Sade; Erdem Koc; Senol Adanur; Mecit Kantarci
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  Early diagnosis of disease using microbead array technology: A review.

Authors:  Sanam Foroutan Parsa; Atieh Vafajoo; Azin Rostami; Reza Salarian; Mohammad Rabiee; Navid Rabiee; Ghazal Rabiee; Mohammadreza Tahriri; Amir Yadegari; Daryoosh Vashaee; Lobat Tayebi; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 6.558

8.  Evaluating Quantum Dot Performance in Homogeneous FRET Immunoassays for Prostate Specific Antigen.

Authors:  Shashi Bhuckory; Olivier Lefebvre; Xue Qiu; Karl David Wegner; Niko Hildebrandt
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Levels of plasma glycan-binding auto-IgG biomarkers improve the accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Julia Matzenbacher Dos Santos; Aby Joiakim; David J Kaplan; David A Putt; German Perez Bakovic; Shannon L Servoss; Benjamin A Rybicki; Alan A Dombkowski; Hyesook Kim
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.396

10.  Single-molecule amplification-free multiplexed detection of circulating microRNA cancer biomarkers from serum.

Authors:  Shenglin Cai; Thomas Pataillot-Meakin; Akifumi Shibakawa; Ren Ren; Charlotte L Bevan; Sylvain Ladame; Aleksandar P Ivanov; Joshua B Edel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.