Literature DB >> 8483399

Integrating stratum-specific likelihood ratios with the analysis of ROC curves.

J C Peirce1, R G Cornell.   

Abstract

Data used to construct receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and to calculate the area under the curve (ROC AUC) can be used to derive stratum-specific likelihood ratios (SSLRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether useful information can be obtained by adding SSLRs to the analysis of ROC curves. The authors analyzed four previously reported sets of data: 1) serum creatine kinase (SCK) for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the coronary care unit (CCU); 2) SCK in the evaluation of chest pain in the emergency center (EC); 3) four predictor variables in the diagnosis of strep throat; and 4) the ordinal assessment of computed tomographic (CT) images. Use of SCK in the CCU produced four strata that had posttest probabilities that were highly discriminating, whereas SCK in the EC resulted in only two strata with limited discriminating ability. In either study the cutpoint at which the SSLR changed from less than to greater than 1.0 was higher than the reported upper normal for the test, thereby quantitating spectrum bias. The maximum number of strata of predictor signs and symptoms for strep throat was three rather than the five used in previous studies. With a larger sample size or pooling, four strata could probably be developed. With CT images, "definitely normal," "probably normal," and "questionable" were collapsed to one negative stratum. "Probably abnormal" became the true "questionable" stratum and "definitely abnormal" was the only positive stratum. The authors conclude that additional useful information is obtained by deriving stratum-specific likelihood ratios as part of the analysis of an ROC curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8483399     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  25 in total

1.  Can periprocedural hypotension in carotid artery stenting be predicted? A carotid morphologic autonomic pathologic scoring model using virtual histology to anticipate hypotension.

Authors:  A Tsurumi; S Miyachi; O Hososhima; T Izumi; T Ohshima; N Matsubara; T Kinkori; T Naito; T Wakabayashi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Validity of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Screener in a representative sample of health plan members.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Lenard A Adler; Michael J Gruber; Chaitanya A Sarawate; Thomas Spencer; David L Van Brunt
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan.

Authors:  Toshi A Furukawa; Norito Kawakami; Mari Saitoh; Yutaka Ono; Yoshibumi Nakane; Yosikazu Nakamura; Hisateru Tachimori; Noboru Iwata; Hidenori Uda; Hideyuki Nakane; Makoto Watanabe; Yoichi Naganuma; Yukihiro Hata; Masayo Kobayashi; Yuko Miyake; Tadashi Takeshima; Takehiko Kikkawa
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Liver stiffness measurement in the risk assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with chronic hepatitis.

Authors:  Yuan-Hung Kuo; Sheng-Nan Lu; Chao-Hung Hung; Kwong-Ming Kee; Chien-Hung Chen; Tsung-Hui Hu; Chuan-Mo Lee; Chi-Sin Changchien; Jing-Houng Wang
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 6.047

5.  Validity of the assessment of bipolar spectrum disorders in the WHO CIDI 3.0.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Hagop S Akiskal; Jules Angst; Margaret Guyer; Robert M A Hirschfeld; Kathleen R Merikangas; Paul E Stang
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Who is the high-risk recipient? Predicting mortality after heart transplant using pretransplant donor and recipient risk factors.

Authors:  Kimberly N Hong; Alexander Iribarne; Berhane Worku; Hiroo Takayama; Annetine C Gelijns; Yoshifumi Naka; Val Jeevanandam; Mark J Russo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  [The DIGG risk score : A risk predictive model of perioperative mortality after elective treatment of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the DIGG register].

Authors:  M Steffen; T Schmitz-Rixen; G Jung; D Böckler; R T Grundmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Who is the high-risk recipient? Predicting mortality after lung transplantation using pretransplant risk factors.

Authors:  Mark J Russo; Ryan R Davies; Kimberly N Hong; Alexander Iribarne; Steven Kawut; Matthew Bacchetta; Frank D'Ovidio; Selim Arcasoy; Joshua R Sonett
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Quantifying diagnostic uncertainty using item response theory: the Posterior Probability of Diagnosis Index.

Authors:  Oliver Lindhiem; David J Kolko; Lan Yu
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2013-01-28

10.  Accuracy of the pain numeric rating scale as a screening test in primary care.

Authors:  Erin E Krebs; Timothy S Carey; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.