Literature DB >> 11080408

Introducing diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

A C Moberg1, A Montgomery.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis varies from 60% to 90% depending on age and gender. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of diagnostic laparoscopy for diagnostic purposes in patients with suspected acute appendicitis to prevent unnecessary laparotomy and to leave a macroscopically normal appendix in place.
METHODS: For this study, 500 consecutive patients with suspected acute appendicitis admitted between January 1994 and October 1996 were included prospectively in a surgical training program set to provide diagnostic laparoscopy on a 24-h-a-day basis. Primary open operation was performed when no laparoscopically trained surgeon was available. Short-term outcome measurements were recorded, and a retrospective long-term follow-up evaluation was performed.
RESULTS: We succeeded in performing a diagnostic laparoscopy in 376 patients and a primary open operation in 124 patients. The overall appendicitis rate was 78%. A diagnostic laparoscopy alone was performed in 66 patients (56 of which were fertile women), with a median operating time of 36 min and a complication rate of 0%. The overall complication rate was 8.0%. During a median follow-up period of 19 months one patient returned on a later occasion with appendicitis. At completion of the study, 85% of the surgeons were skilled in diagnostic laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial education effort is needed to introduce diagnostic laparoscopy on a 24-h-a-day basis. Diagnostic laparoscopy has a high rate of accuracy, short operating time, and low associated morbidity, and prevents unnecessary laparotomy. It is possible to leave a macroscopically normal-appearing appendix in place.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11080408     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  55 in total

1.  Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  D Mutter; M Vix; A Bui; S Evrard; V Tassetti; J F Breton; J Marescaux
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Diagnostic laparoscopy.

Authors:  A G Nagy; D James
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; S Larsen; E Trondsen; B Edwin; A E Faerden; A R Rosseland
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The postoperative incidence of small bowel obstruction following standard, open appendectomy and cholecystectomy: a six-year retrospective cohort study at Yale-New Haven Hospital.

Authors:  R I Zbar; W B Crede; C F McKhann; J F Jekel
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  1993-03

5.  Laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  A Pier; F Götz; C Bacher; R Ibald
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopy in the prevention of unnecessary appendicectomies: a prospective study.

Authors:  A A Deutsch; A Zelikovsky; R Reiss
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

Authors:  A Hellberg; C Rudberg; E Kullman; L Enochsson; G Fenyö; H Graffner; B Hallerbäck; B Johansson; B Anderberg; J Wenner; I Ringqvist; S Sörensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1043 patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A C Moberg; G Ahlberg; C E Leijonmarck; A Montgomery; O Reiertsen; A R Rosseland; R Stoerksson
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-11

9.  Laparoscopic surgery in women with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  M R Cox; J L McCall; R T Padbury; T G Wilson; D A Wattchow; J Toouli
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1995-02-06       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Negative findings at appendectomy.

Authors:  W Y Lau; S T Fan; T F Yiu; K W Chu; S H Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.