Literature DB >> 10027359

Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

A Hellberg1, C Rudberg, E Kullman, L Enochsson, G Fenyö, H Graffner, B Hallerbäck, B Johansson, B Anderberg, J Wenner, I Ringqvist, S Sörensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized multicentre study was performed to compare the outcome of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
METHODS: A total of 523 patients was randomized, but because of 23 withdrawals the outcome in 500 patients is reported, 244 in the laparoscopic group and 256 in the open group.
RESULTS: Patients having laparoscopic appendicectomy recovered more quickly than those having open surgery (13 versus 21 days, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in duration of sick leave after operation (laparoscopic group 11 days versus open group 14 days). Postoperative pain (at 24 h, 7 days and 14 days) was less after laparoscopic operations and a functional index 1 week after operation was more favourable in these patients (P < 0.001). Operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (60 versus 35 min, P < 0.01). Hospital stay and complications did not differ between the groups. Thirty laparoscopic procedures (12 per cent) were converted to open appendicectomy.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendicectomy is as safe as open appendicectomy and has the advantage of allowing a quicker recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10027359     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00971.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  49 in total

1.  Evaluation of the cost for laparoscopic-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy.

Authors:  Y Adachi; N Shiraishi; K Ikebe; M Aramaki; T Bandoh; S Kitano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Intraabdominal abscess following open and laparoscopic appendectomy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  R McKinlay; S Neeleman; R Klein; K Stevens; J Greenfeld; M Ghory; C Cosentino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; A Fingerhut; J Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Wound healing after open appendectomies in adult patients: a prospective, randomised trial comparing two methods of wound closure.

Authors:  S Kotaluoto; S-L Pauniaho; M Helminen; H Kuokkanen; T Rantanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Galinos Barmparas; Bernardino C Branco; Beat Schnüriger; Lydia Lam; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Port site necrotising fasciitis following laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Authors:  Gargeshwari K G Raghavendra; Sarah Mills; Michael Carr
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-10-12

Review 7.  Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review.

Authors:  M Kapischke; A Caliebe; J Tepel; T Schulz; J Hedderich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  S Towfigh; F Chen; R Mason; N Katkhouda; L Chan; T Berne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Complicated appendicitis: laparoscopic or conventional surgery?

Authors:  Boris Kirshtein; Michael Bayme; Sergey Domchik; Solly Mizrahi; Leonid Lantsberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Samir Delibegović; Ervin Matović
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.