Literature DB >> 9845129

Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1043 patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

A C Moberg1, G Ahlberg, C E Leijonmarck, A Montgomery, O Reiertsen, A R Rosseland, R Stoerksson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis, the number of complications associated with the laparoscopic technique, and the effect of leaving a macroscopically normal-looking appendix in place.
DESIGN: Three prospective protocols.
SETTING: Three departments of surgery, one in Norway and two in Sweden.
SUBJECTS: 1043 patients aged 15 years or over.
INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis who were to be operated on. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity, mortality, and histological appearance of removed appendices, and outcome whether or not the patient was operated on.
RESULTS: 819 patients had appendectomies (61% laparoscopically and 39% by conversion to open operation) with a total complication rate of 10%. In 211 patients a diagnostic laparoscopy was done as a single procedure. There were 181 women in this group and 86 of them had gynaecological disorders. The complication rate was 2% among these 211 patients and after a follow up of two years no patients had been readmitted for appendicectomy. 13 patients were subjected to other open procedures. The overall mortality was 0.4%.
CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy is safe and can be recommended in patients with suspected acute appendicitis, particularly in women. A macroscopically normal-looking appendix can be left in place.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9845129     DOI: 10.1080/110241598750005246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  23 in total

1.  Laparoscopy for every acute appendicitis?

Authors:  K Slim; J Chipponi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Should an appendix that appears normal be removed?].

Authors:  B Garlipp; G Arlt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Selective use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  W T van den Broek; A B Bijnen; P V van Eerten; P de Ruiter; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Introducing diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A C Moberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score.

Authors:  C D Douglas; N E Macpherson; P M Davidson; J S Gani
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-14

6.  Evaluation of the appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy, the laparoscopic appendicitis score: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jenneke T H Hamminga; H Sijbrand Hofker; Paul M A Broens; Philip M Kluin; Erik Heineman; Jan Willem Haveman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The morbidity of negative appendicectomy.

Authors:  M Lee; T Paavana; F Mazari; T R Wilson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Appendicopathy--a clinical and diagnostic dilemma.

Authors:  Lars Ivo Partecke; Andrea Thiele; Franziska Schmidt-Wankel; Wolfram Kessler; Michael Wodny; Frank Dombrowski; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Wolfram von Bernstorff
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The Unacceptable Morbidity of Negative Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.

Authors:  Matthew G R Allaway; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate?

Authors:  Gamal Khairy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.