Literature DB >> 9189105

Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy.

O Reiertsen1, S Larsen, E Trondsen, B Edwin, A E Faerden, A R Rosseland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A prospective study including 272 patients with suspected appendicitis was performed. The aims were to evaluate the representativity of the study group and to compare diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy with conventional appendicectomy.
METHODS: The study was an open, randomized, single-centre trial with sequential design. One hundred and eight patients were randomized between laparoscopy or conventional appendicectomy, of whom 84 had acute appendicitis. Duration of postoperative convalescence was the major endpoint.
RESULTS: The study patients were representative of the eligible population regarding age and stage of appendicitis. The risk of unnecessary appendicectomy was significantly (P = 0.03) lower after laparoscopy. The mean difference in duration of postoperative convalescence was 4.7 days in favour of of laparoscopic appendicectomy (P = 0.07), and 26 min in duration of operation in favour of conventional appendicectomy (P < 0.01). No differences were detected in postoperative hospital stay, pain assessment or complications.
CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic procedure is at least as good as conventional appendicectomy. Initial laparoscopy reduces the rate of misdiagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9189105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  28 in total

1.  Intraabdominal abscess following open and laparoscopic appendectomy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  R McKinlay; S Neeleman; R Klein; K Stevens; J Greenfeld; M Ghory; C Cosentino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; A Fingerhut; J Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review.

Authors:  M Kapischke; A Caliebe; J Tepel; T Schulz; J Hedderich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook.

Authors:  G C Roviaro; C Vergani; F Varoli; M Francese; R Caminiti; M Maciocco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial to prove safety.

Authors:  John-Edwin Thomson; Deirdré Kruger; Christine Jann-Kruger; Akos Kiss; J A O Omoshoro-Jones; Thifheli Luvhengo; Martin Brand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  Namir Katkhouda; Rodney J Mason; Shirin Towfigh; Anna Gevorgyan; Rahila Essani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in overweight patients.

Authors:  L Enochsson; A Hellberg; C Rudberg; G Fenyö; T Gudbjartsson; E Kullman; I Ringqvist; S Sörensen; J Wenner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Samir Delibegović; Ervin Matović
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaohang Li; Jialin Zhang; Lixuan Sang; Wenliang Zhang; Zhiqiang Chu; Xin Li; Yongfeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  M Milewczyk; M Michalik; M Ciesielski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.