Literature DB >> 2523669

Diagnostic laparoscopy.

A G Nagy1, D James.   

Abstract

This report examines the value of laparoscopy as a diagnostic aid to one general surgeon. Seventy-seven consecutive patients who underwent this procedure are reported. In 31 patients, laparoscopy was performed for assessment of the cause of acute abdominal pain. Diagnosis was achieved in 28 patients (90 percent) and laparotomy was avoided in 17 (55 percent). Assessment of chronic abdominal pain in 11 patients yielded a diagnostic accuracy in 9 (82 percent) and laparotomy was avoided in 7 (64 percent). In 11 patients with abdominal trauma, diagnostic accuracy was 91 percent (10 of 11 patients) and laparotomy was not required in 6 (54 percent). In 21 patients with intraabdominal malignancy, 14 (67 percent) were accurately assessed, and in 8 (38 percent) formal exploration was spared. Three patients with obscure causes of ascites and jaundice were all accurately assessed without need for laparotomy. Based on our data, we believe the reports in the literature are reproducible by any abdominal surgeon who uses laparoscopy as a diagnostic aid in their practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2523669     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90642-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  16 in total

1.  Diagnostic laparoscopy for the acute abdomen and trauma.

Authors:  W Majewski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Strategies for reducing inappropriate laparotomy rate in the acute abdomen.

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-02

3.  Laparoscopic staging of intraabdominal malignancy.

Authors:  A W Hemming; A G Nagy; C H Scudamore; K Edelmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  1000 consecutive laparoscopies in gynaecological practice.

Authors:  S Kehoe; M J Mylotte
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Diagnostic yield and management benefit of laparoscopy: a prospective audit.

Authors:  G C Vander Velpen; S M Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Role of Laparoscopy in Chronic and Recurrent Abdominal Pain-Rural Area Experience.

Authors:  Anil Rathod; Aditi Agrawal; Bhupendra Mehera
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  The Utility of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Post-Bariatric Surgery Patients with Chronic Abdominal Pain of Unknown Etiology.

Authors:  Mohammad Alsulaimy; Suriya Punchai; Fouzeyah A Ali; Matthew Kroh; Philip R Schauer; Stacy A Brethauer; Ali Aminian
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Emergency laparoscopy. Technical support for the laparoscopic diagnosis of intestinal ischemia.

Authors:  U Matern; J Haberstroh; A el Saman; E Pauly; R Salm; E H Farthmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Introducing diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A C Moberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.