Literature DB >> 11061445

The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty.

R L Barrack1, T R Lyons, R Q Ingraham, J C Johnson.   

Abstract

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a second-generation modular rotating hinge design was performed on 16 knees in 15 patients over a 5-year period. Follow-up of 2 to 6 years (mean, 51 months) was obtained in 14 knees in 13 patients. Indications for revision were aseptic loosening of a hinged prosthesis (8 knees), loosening and bone loss associated with chronic extensor mechanism disruption (2 knees), component instability with chronic medial collateral ligament disruption (3 knees), and comminuted distal femur fracture (1 knee). Clinical and radiographic results were reviewed and compared with 87 patients who underwent revision TKA using a standard condylar revision design during the same period. Early results showed comparable postoperative knee scores and range of motion between the 2 groups despite the use of the rotating hinge component in more complex revision cases. No patient has exhibited radiographic evidence of definite component loosening. Alignment of 5 degrees to 10 degrees of valgus in the frontal plane and within 2 degrees of neutral in the sagittal plane was achieved consistently. Short-term clinical and radiographic results are encouraging and suggest that a second-generation modular rotating hinge component can be used successfully in selected salvage revision cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11061445     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.9056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  26 in total

1.  Guided-motion hinged knee replacement prosthesis: early survival rate and postoperative patient function and satisfaction.

Authors:  David L Perrin; Thomas R Turgeon
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Case report: Failure of rotating-hinge total knee prosthesis by disengagement of the hinge-post extension.

Authors:  Debdut Biswas; Bryan Haughom; Robert E Mayle; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Increased constraint of rotating hinge knee prosthesis is associated with poorer clinical outcomes as compared to constrained condylar knee prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason Beng Teck Lim; Hee Nee Pang; Keng Jin Darren Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-16

Review 4.  Failure rate of a rotating hinge knee design due to yoke fracture of the hinged tibial insert: a retrospective data analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Joerg Friesenbichler; Ran Schwarzkopf; Patrick Sadoghi; Scott E Marwin; Mathias Glehr; Werner Maurer-Ertl; Andreas Leithner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Hinged total knee arthroplasty in the presence of ligamentous deficiency.

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Manuel A Sandoval-García
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fahad Hossain; Shelain Patel; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Quality of life and clinical outcome in salvage revision total knee replacement: hinged vs total condylar design.

Authors:  Susanne Fuchs; Christian Sandmann; Georg Gerdemann; Adrian Skwara; Carsten O Tibesku; Friedrich Bottner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  [Special prosthesis implant with partial femoral replacement. Operation after periprosthetic femoral fracture and ipsilateral long-stem knee prosthesis and fixed-angle osteosynthesis].

Authors:  C Herren; M J Ringe; U Rietkötter; R Sobottke; J Siewe; M Graf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Puyi Sheng; Matti Lehto; Matti Kataja; Pekka Halonen; Teemu Moilanen; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.