Literature DB >> 22202962

Failure rate of a rotating hinge knee design due to yoke fracture of the hinged tibial insert: a retrospective data analysis and review of the literature.

Joerg Friesenbichler1, Ran Schwarzkopf, Patrick Sadoghi, Scott E Marwin, Mathias Glehr, Werner Maurer-Ertl, Andreas Leithner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rotating hinge knee prostheses are known to provide inherent stability. Yoke fractures of the hinged tibial insert of modern generation rotating hinge devices are a matter of continued concern. The aim of this study was to describe incidence and management of yoke fracture of the LPS™ hinged tibial insert.
METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of two institutions identified 40 patients with a LPS™ total knee arthroplasty. Implant survival and prosthetic complications was calculated according to Kaplan-Meier.
RESULTS: Out of the group of 40 patients, four fractures of the metal yoke occurred in four cases (failure rate: 10%). Furthermore, a second fracture occurred in two patients. The overall revision-free prosthetic survival was 57% at 38 months, while prosthetic survival until yoke fracture was 86% at 38 months.
CONCLUSION: Handling yoke fractures as mechanical complication includes replacing the hinged insert, stabilization of the joint and joint line height preservation in order to decrease the cantilever effect at the insert-base plate interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22202962      PMCID: PMC3337105          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1462-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Early catastrophic failure of rotating hinge total knee prosthesis.

Authors:  C J Wang; H E Wang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Evolution of the rotating hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7- to 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Petrou; H Petrou; C Tilkeridis; T Stavrakis; T Kapetsis; N Kremmidas; M Gavras
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

4.  Preoperative planning for revision total knee arthroplasty:avoiding chaos.

Authors:  Kenneth A Gustke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Dislocation of rotating-hinge knee prostheses with antidislocation mechanism.

Authors:  Daniel Pacha-Vicente; Amer Malik; Enric Castellet-Feliu; Joan Nardi-Vilardaga
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Megaprostheses after resection of distal femoral tumors. A rotating hinge design in 30 patients followed for 2-7 years.

Authors:  P F Choong; F H Sim; D J Pritchard; M G Rock; E Y Chao
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-08

7.  The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  H E Figgie; V M Goldberg; K G Heiple; H S Moller; N H Gordon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review.

Authors:  Eric R Henderson; John S Groundland; Elisa Pala; Jeremy A Dennis; Rebecca Wooten; David Cheong; Reinhard Windhager; Rainer I Kotz; Mario Mercuri; Philipp T Funovics; Francis J Hornicek; H Thomas Temple; Pietro Ruggieri; G Douglas Letson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in severly affected knees.

Authors:  G H Westrich; A V Mollano; T P Sculco; R L Buly; R S Laskin; R Windsor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Distal femur resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction: a long-term followup study.

Authors:  Jacob Bickels; James C Wittig; Yehuda Kollender; Robert M Henshaw; Kristen L Kellar-Graney; Issac Meller; Martin M Malawer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  7 in total

1.  Case report: Failure of rotating-hinge total knee prosthesis by disengagement of the hinge-post extension.

Authors:  Debdut Biswas; Bryan Haughom; Robert E Mayle; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up.

Authors:  Takashi Sakai; Kenji Ohzono; Takashi Nishii; Masaki Takao; Hidenobu Miki; Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  The incidence of implant fractures after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Magdalena M Gilg; Christian W Zeller; Lukas Leitner; Andreas Leithner; Gerold Labek; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Fracture of the insert cone of a polyethylene liner in a failed posterior-stabilized, rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marc R Angerame; Jason M Jennings; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-11-07

Review 5.  Dislocation of rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carlos A Encinas-Ullán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero; Juan S Ruiz-Pérez; E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-02-01

6.  Posterior dislocation of the hinge-post extension in a rotating hinge total knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Givenchy Manzano; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2013-09-23

Review 7.  Total knee arthroplasty using hinge joints: Indications and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-04-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.