Literature DB >> 25034278

[Special prosthesis implant with partial femoral replacement. Operation after periprosthetic femoral fracture and ipsilateral long-stem knee prosthesis and fixed-angle osteosynthesis].

C Herren1, M J Ringe, U Rietkötter, R Sobottke, J Siewe, M Graf.   

Abstract

The development of modular prostheses is becoming increasingly important in revision surgery due to the rising need of arthroplasty in knee and hip joints. The demand for suitable prostheses is high because of the desire for a higher mobility and a good postoperative functionality, whereby preliminary experience with megaprostheses using modular implant systems in orthopedic oncology have already been obtained. Considering the clinical outcome of our 58-year-old patient (obesity III, BMI 58) and the third revision operation after two periprosthetic fractures, a megaprosthesis was implanted (Mega C-system, co. Link, Hamburg). We aimed both at good clinical functionality and good stability of the knee joint. After the implant, a good functional result was observed at the beginning; however, there were some indices for prosthesis loosening. During the fourth revision we implanted a total femoral replacement. Postoperatively, a good clinical outcome after intensive physiotherapy was observed. Nevertheless, the use of megaprostheses has to be judged cautiously because of a lack of long-term results. In addition, it should not be used as a standard implant in periprosthetic joint surgery because of the risk of aseptic loosening during its course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25034278     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-014-2623-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  17 in total

1.  Evolution of the rotating hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7- to 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Petrou; H Petrou; C Tilkeridis; T Stavrakis; T Kapetsis; N Kremmidas; M Gavras
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

Review 3.  Proximal femoral replacements with megaprostheses.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Franklin H Sim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Prosthetic knee replacement after resection of a malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur. Medium to long-term results.

Authors:  A Kawai; G F Muschler; J M Lane; J C Otis; J H Healey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Subcapital stress fracture of the femoral neck after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D Palance Martin; J Albareda; F Seral
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Fractured femoral shaft through an osteolytic lesion resulting from the reaction to a prosthesis. A case report.

Authors:  U Pazzaglia; P D Byers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1984-05

7.  The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; T R Lyons; R Q Ingraham; J C Johnson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Periprosthetic knee fractures.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Nikhil Jain; Andrew H Schmidt
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 10.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements.

Authors:  Edward T Su; Hargovind DeWal; Paul E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.