Literature DB >> 11050628

Primary care physicians' perceptions of barriers to genetic testing and their willingness to participate in research.

E Mountcastle-Shah1, N A Holtzman.   

Abstract

Our objective was to explore the barriers and motivations to: 1) appropriate diffusion of genetic services into primary care practice; and 2) primary care physicians' (PCPs) willingness to participate in clinical studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of emerging genetic technologies. A random sample (n = 994) of PCPs was invited to be interviewed. Of the 80 who agreed, 60 were interviewed, 52 by telephone. A semi-structured guide was used. A questionnaire mailed to 752 of the PCPs was used to elicit information from physicians who did not want to be interviewed. Among interviewees, uncertainty as to the clinical utility and clinical validity of predictive genetic testing were the leading barriers to incorporation of this technology into practice, being mentioned by 60 and 43% of subjects, respectively. Of the 100 (13. 3%) physicians returning the questionnaire who declined to be interviewed, 30% said they would be willing to participate in research on the safety and effectiveness of predictive genetic tests. Of those who were interviewed, 92% were willing to participate in such research. Most physicians do not see genetics as important in their practice today; many anticipate greater importance in the future. The proportion of physicians interested in participating in research to assess the safety and effectiveness of genetic tests is sufficient to make large scale, collaborative, practice-based evaluation feasible. Additionally, participation in research may serve as an effective medium for physician education in genetics. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11050628     DOI: 10.1002/1096-8628(20001023)94:5<409::aid-ajmg13>3.0.co;2-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  21 in total

1.  Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Benjamin S Wilfond; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Primary care role in expanded newborn screening: After the heel prick test.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; June C Carroll; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty; Brenda J Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Cancer risk assessment by rural and Appalachian family medicine physicians.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Margaret M Love; Kevin A Pearce; Kyle Porter; Mary A Barron; Michael Andrykowski
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Clinical and public health implications of emerging genetic technologies.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Laberge; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.299

5.  Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Karen P Powell; Carol A Christianson; Whitney A Cogswell; Gaurav Dave; Amit Verma; Sonja Eubanks; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Physicians' attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing before and after pharmacogenetic education.

Authors:  Jasmine A Luzum; Matthew J Luzum
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Acceptability of prenatal diagnosis by a sample of parents of sickle cell anemia patients in Cameroon (sub-Saharan Africa).

Authors:  Ambroise Wonkam; Alfred K Njamnshi; Dora Mbanya; Jeanne Ngogang; Caryl Zameyo; Fru F Angwafo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Madeline M Carrig; Julianne M O'Daniel; Lori A Orlando; Ley A Killeya-Jones; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Alex Cho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Primary care physicians' willingness to offer a new genetic test to tailor smoking treatment, according to test characteristics.

Authors:  Alexandra E Shields; Douglas E Levy; David Blumenthal; Douglas Currivan; Mary McGinn-Shapiro; Kevin B Weiss; Recai Yucel; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Promotion of cancer family history awareness: Jameslink Cancer Risk Assessment Tool at community health fairs.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Kyle Porter; Amber Remy; Judith A Westman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.