Literature DB >> 19780917

Cancer risk assessment by rural and Appalachian family medicine physicians.

Kimberly M Kelly1, Margaret M Love, Kevin A Pearce, Kyle Porter, Mary A Barron, Michael Andrykowski.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Challenges to the identification of hereditary cancer in primary care may be more pronounced in rural Appalachia, a medically underserved region.
PURPOSE: To examine primary care physicians' identification of hereditary cancers.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was mailed to family physicians in the midwestern and southeastern United States, stratified by rural/non-rural and Appalachian/non-Appalachian practice location (n = 176). Identification of hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (BRCA1/2), hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC), and other hereditary cancers was assessed.
FINDINGS: Less than half of physicians (45%) reported having patients with cancer genetic testing. Most (70%) correctly identified the BRCA1/2-relevant scenario; 49% correctly identified the HNPCC-relevant scenario. Factor analysis of psychosocial variables revealed 2 factors: Confidence (knowledge, comfort, confidence) and importance (responsible, important, effective, need) of identifying hereditary cancer. Greater confidence was associated with use of 3 generation pedigree in taking family history. Greater knowledge and access to genetic services were associated with use of genetic testing. More recent graduation year, greater knowledge, and greater confidence were associated with identifying the BRCA1/2-relevant scenario. Greater knowledge and confidence were associated with identifying the HNPCC-relevant scenario.
CONCLUSIONS: Though rural Appalachian physicians do not differ in ability to identify high risk individuals, access barriers may exist for genetic testing. Interventions are needed to boost physician confidence in identifying hereditary cancer and to improve availability and awareness of availability of genetic services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19780917      PMCID: PMC3319913          DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00246.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  30 in total

1.  GPs' views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice.

Authors:  A Fry; H Campbell; H Gudmunsdottir; R Rush; M Porteous; D Gorman; A Cull
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Primary care physicians' attitudes and practices regarding cancer genetics: a comparison of 2001 with 1996 survey results.

Authors:  Lois C Friedman; H Paul Cooper; John A Webb; Armin D Weinberg; Sharon E Plon
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Reconsidering the family history in primary care.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich; Wylie Burke; Caryl J Heaton; Susanne Haga; Linda Pinsky; M Priscilla Short; Louise Acheson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Cancer genetics in primary care. When is genetic screening an option and when is it the standard of care?

Authors:  L J Elsas; A Trepanier
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Genetic testing: a physician's perspective.

Authors:  J D Menasha; C Schechter; J Willner
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2000-03

6.  Genetics in obstetricians' offices: a survey study.

Authors:  L Wilkins-Haug; L Hill; L Schmidt; G B Holzman; J Schulkin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama's primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics.

Authors:  R T Acton; N M Burst; L Casebeer; S M Ferguson; P Greene; B L Laird; L Leviton
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Physician assessment of family cancer history and referral for genetic evaluation in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Shilpa Grover; Elena M Stoffel; Laoti Bussone; Elizabeth Tschoegl; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Cancer family history reporting: impact of method and psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Randi Shedlosky-Shoemaker; Kyle Porter; Amber Remy; Philip DeSimone; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.717

10.  Swiss primary care physicians' knowledge, attitudes and perception towards genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Gabriella Pichert; Daniel Dietrich; Peter Moosmann; Marcel Zwahlen; Rolf Arno Stahel; André-Pascal Sappino
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.446

View more
  9 in total

1.  Genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice: systematic review of tools available, clinician attitudes, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Flore Laforest; Pia Kirkegaard; Baljinder Mann; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Experiences of Genetic Counselors Practicing in Rural Areas.

Authors:  Margaret Emmet; Quinn Stein; Erin Thorpe; MaryAnn Campion
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Ekland Abdiwahab; Heather M Edwards; Min-Lin Fang; Andrew Jdayani; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Association of Disparities in Family History and Family Cancer History in the Electronic Health Record With Sex, Race, Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity, and Language Preference in 2 Large US Health Care Systems.

Authors:  Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Melody S Goodman; Yuyu Chen; Xiangying Chu; Richard L Bradshaw; Rachelle Lorenz Chambers; Priscilla A Chan; Brianne M Daly; Michael Flynn; Amanda Gammon; Rachel Hess; Cecelia Kessler; Wendy K Kohlmann; Devin M Mann; Rachel Monahan; Sara Peel; Kensaku Kawamoto; Guilherme Del Fiol; Meenakshi Sigireddi; Saundra S Buys; Ophira Ginsburg; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-10-03

5.  Radiation therapy resources and guideline-concordant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer patients in an underserved region.

Authors:  Nengliang Yao; Stephen A Matthews; Marianne M Hillemeier; Roger T Anderson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Understanding Genomic Knowledge in Rural Appalachia: The West Virginia Genome Community Project.

Authors:  Jennifer A Mallow; Laurie A Theeke; Patricia Crawford; Elizabeth Prendergast; Chuck Conner; Tony Richards; Barbara McKown; Donna Bush; Donald Reed; Meagan E Stabler; Jianjun Zhang; Geri Dino; Taura L Barr
Journal:  Online J Rural Nurs Health Care       Date:  2016

7.  Barriers and motivators for referral of patients with suspected lynch syndrome to cancer genetic services: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Yen Y Tan; Lisa J Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-02-18

8.  Knowledge, attitudes and referral patterns of lynch syndrome: a survey of clinicians in australia.

Authors:  Yen Y Tan; Amanda B Spurdle; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-05-12

9.  Comparing models of delivery for cancer genetics services among patients receiving primary care who meet criteria for genetic evaluation in two healthcare systems: BRIDGE randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Wendy Kohlmann; Rachelle Lorenz Chambers; Melody S Goodman; Richard Bradshaw; Priscilla A Chan; Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Sarah V Colonna; Whitney F Espinel; Jessica N Everett; Amanda Gammon; Eric R Goldberg; Javier Gonzalez; Kelsi J Hagerty; Rachel Hess; Kelsey Kehoe; Cecilia Kessler; Kadyn E Kimball; Shane Loomis; Tiffany R Martinez; Rachel Monahan; Joshua D Schiffman; Dani Temares; Katie Tobik; David W Wetter; Devin M Mann; Kensaku Kawamoto; Guilherme Del Fiol; Saundra S Buys; Ophira Ginsburg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.