Literature DB >> 18584467

Primary care physicians' willingness to offer a new genetic test to tailor smoking treatment, according to test characteristics.

Alexandra E Shields1, Douglas E Levy, David Blumenthal, Douglas Currivan, Mary McGinn-Shapiro, Kevin B Weiss, Recai Yucel, Caryn Lerman.   

Abstract

Emerging pharmacogenetics research may improve clinical outcomes for common complex conditions typically treated in primary care settings. Physicians' willingness to offer genetically-tailored treatments to their patients will be critical to realizing this potential. According to recent research, it is likely that genotypes used to tailor smoking will have pleiotropic associations with other addictions and diseases, and may have different frequencies across populations. These additional features may pose an additional barrier to adoption. To assess physicians' willingness to offer a new test to individually tailor smoking treatment according to specific test characteristics, we conducted a national mailed survey of 2,000 U.S. primary care physicians (response rate: 62.3%). Physicians responded to a baseline scenario describing a new test to tailor smoking treatment, and three additional scenarios describing specific test characteristics based on published research; there was random assignment to one of two survey conditions in which the test was described as a genetic or non-genetic test. Our findings indicate physicians' self-reported likelihood (0-100 scale) that they would offer a new test to tailor smoking cessation treatment ranged from 69%-78% across all scenarios. Relative to baseline scenario responses, physicians were significantly less likely to offer the test when informed that the same genotypes assessed for treatment tailoring: (1) may also identify individuals predisposed to become addicted to nicotine (p<.001), (2) differ in frequency by race (p<.004), and (3) may have associations with other conditions (e.g., alcohol and cocaine addiction, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ADHD and Tourette Syndrome) (p<.01). Describing a new test to individually tailor smoking treatment as a "genetic" versus non-genetic test significantly reduced physicians' likelihood of offering the test across all scenarios, regardless of specific test characteristics (p<.0007). Effective education of primary care physicians will be critical to successful integration of promising new pharmacogenetic treatment strategies for smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18584467      PMCID: PMC3814125          DOI: 10.1080/14622200802087580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  48 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of integrating genetic medicine into primary care.

Authors:  J Emery; S Hayflick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-28

2.  Primary care physicians' perceptions of barriers to genetic testing and their willingness to participate in research.

Authors:  E Mountcastle-Shah; N A Holtzman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-10-23

3.  CYP2B6 genotype alters abstinence rates in a bupropion smoking cessation trial.

Authors:  Anna M Lee; Christopher Jepson; Ewa Hoffmann; Leonard Epstein; Larry W Hawk; Caryn Lerman; Rachel F Tyndale
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  The serotonin transporter 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and treatment response to nicotine patch: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sean P David; Marcus R Munafò; Michael F G Murphy; Robert T Walton; Elaine C Johnstone
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Measuring and predicting surgeons' practice styles for breast cancer treatment in older women.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; C D Berg; N J Meropol; S B Edge; K Gold; Y T Hwang; J Hadley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and the dopamine D4 receptor gene.

Authors:  P Muglia; U Jain; F Macciardi; J L Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-06-12

7.  Primary care physicians' knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer predisposition.

Authors:  M Escher; A P Sappino
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.

Authors:  J W Peabody; J Luck; P Glassman; T R Dresselhaus; M Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Pharmacogenetics and the practice of medicine.

Authors:  A D Roses
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The question not asked: the challenge of pleiotropic genetic tests.

Authors:  Robert Wachbroit
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1998-06
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Precision Medicine for Tobacco Dependence: Development and Validation of the Nicotine Metabolite Ratio.

Authors:  Cheyenne E Allenby; Kelly A Boylan; Caryn Lerman; Mary Falcone
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Bumps along the translational pathway: anticipating uptake of tailored smoking cessation treatment.

Authors:  Alexandra Elizabeth Shields; Mehdi Najafzadeh; Anna Boonin Schachter
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 3.  Biomarkers to optimize the treatment of nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Robert A Schnoll; Frank T Leone
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.851

4.  Physician barriers to incorporating pharmacogenetic treatment strategies for nicotine dependence into clinical practice.

Authors:  R A Schnoll; A E Shields
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Professional perspectives about pharmacogenetic testing and managing ancillary findings.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Genevieve Tindall; Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-07-19

6.  Primary care physicians' knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; W Burke; G S Ginsburg; R Mills; R Agans
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Julianne M O'Daniel; Genevieve M Tindall; Isaac R Lipkus; Robert Agans
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Prenatal healthcare providers' Gaucher disease carrier screening practices.

Authors:  Dana Falcone; Elisabeth McCarty Wood; Michael Mennuti; Sharon X Xie; Vivianna M Van Deerlin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; J M O'Daniel; G M Tindall; I R Lipkus; R Agans
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.550

10.  Improving Community Advisory Board Engagement in Precision Medicine Research to Reduce Health Disparities.

Authors:  Erin Connors; Rebecca Selove; Juan Canedo; Maureen Sanderson; Pamela Hull; Marilyn Adams; Ila McDermott; Calvin Barlow; Denice Johns-Porter; Caree McAfee; Karen Gilliam; Oscar Miller; Nora Cox; Mary Kay Fadden; Stephen King; Hilary Tindle
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2019
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.