Literature DB >> 11003269

False cerebral activation on BOLD functional MR images: study of low-amplitude motion weakly correlated to stimulus.

A S Field1, Y F Yen, J H Burdette, A D Elster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Movements of the participant during blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional MR imaging cerebral activation studies are known to produce occasionally regions of false activation, especially when these movements are relatively large (>3 mm) and highly correlated with the stimulus. We investigated whether minimal (<1 mm), weakly correlated movements in a controlled functional MR imaging model could produce false activation artifacts that could potentially mimic regions of true activation in size, location, and statistical significance.
METHODS: A life-size brain phantom was constructed by embedding vials of a dilute carboxylic acid solution within a gadolinium-doped gelatin mold. Imaging was performed at 1.5 T using a 2D spiral sequence (3,000/5 [TR/TE]; flip angle, 88 degrees; matrix, 64 x 64; field of view, 24 cm; section thickness, 5 mm). Controlled, in-plane, submillimeter movements of the phantom were generated using a pneumatic system and were made to correlate with a hypothetical "boxcar" stimulus over the range 0.31 < r < 0.96. Regions of false activation were sought using standard statistical methods (SPM96) that excluded phantom edges and accounted for spatial extent (regions tested at P < .05, corrected for multiple comparisons). A similar experiment was performed on a resting volunteer.
RESULTS: The pneumatic system provided motion control with average in-plane displacements and rotations of 0.74 mm and 0.47 degrees, respectively, in the 18 data sets analyzed. No areas of false activation in the phantom were identified for poorly correlated motions (r < 0.52). Above this level, false activations occurred with increasing frequency, scaling in size and number with the degree of motion correlation. For motions with r > 0.67, areas of false activation were seen in every experiment. For a statistical threshold of P = .001, the median number of falsely activated regions was 3.5, with a mean size of 71.7 voxels (approximately 5 cc). Areas of possibly false activation of average size 72.5 voxels resulting from passive motion of the resting human participant were observed in two of four experiments.
CONCLUSION: Participant movements of 1 mm or less that are only modestly correlated with a blocked stimulus paradigm can produce appreciable false activation artifacts on BOLD functional MR imaging studies, even when strict image realignment methods are used to prevent them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11003269      PMCID: PMC7974040     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  14 in total

1.  Effect of motion outside the field of view on functional MR.

Authors:  F Z Yetkin; V M Haughton; R W Cox; J Hyde; R M Birn; E C Wong; R Prost
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Methods for diagnosis and treatment of stimulus-correlated motion in generic brain activation studies using fMRI.

Authors:  E T Bullmore; M J Brammer; S Rabe-Hesketh; V A Curtis; R G Morris; S C Williams; T Sharma; P K McGuire
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot.

Authors:  G H Glover; S Lai
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Cortical activation response to acoustic echo planar scanner noise.

Authors:  J L Ulmer; B B Biswal; F Z Yetkin; L P Mark; V P Mathews; R W Prost; L D Estkowski; T L McAuliffe; V M Haughton; D L Daniels
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Contour-based registration technique to differentiate between task-activated and head motion-induced signal variations in fMRI.

Authors:  B B Biswal; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent.

Authors:  K J Friston; K J Worsley; R S Frackowiak; J C Mazziotta; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; E C Wong; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain.

Authors:  J V Hajnal; R Myers; A Oatridge; J E Schwieso; I R Young; G M Bydder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Prospective tissue-mimicking materials for use in NMR imaging phantoms.

Authors:  E L Madsen; G D Fullerton
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Agarose as a tissue equivalent phantom material for NMR imaging.

Authors:  M D Mitchell; H L Kundel; L Axel; P M Joseph
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  29 in total

1.  Monitoring eye movements during fMRI tasks with echo planar images.

Authors:  Jason R Tregellas; Jody L Tanabe; David E Miller; Robert Freedman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Functional MRI of the cervical spinal cord on 1.5 T with fingertapping: to what extent is it feasible?

Authors:  N Govers; J Béghin; J W M Van Goethem; J Michiels; L van den Hauwe; E Vandervliet; P M Parizel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Motion correction and the use of motion covariates in multiple-subject fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Tom Johnstone; Kathleen S Ores Walsh; Larry L Greischar; Andrew L Alexander; Andrew S Fox; Richard J Davidson; Terrence R Oakes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Functional BOLD MRI: comparison of different field strengths in a motor task.

Authors:  T Meindl; C Born; S Britsch; M Reiser; S Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Correlative BOLD MR imaging of stages of synovitis in a rabbit model of antigen-induced arthritis.

Authors:  Andrea S Doria; Adrian Crawley; Harpal Gahunia; Rahim Moineddin; Tammy Rayner; Vivian Tassos; Anguo Zhong; Kenneth Pritzker; Maria Mendes; Roland Jong; Robert B Salter
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-05

6.  False activation in the brain ventricles related to task-correlated breathing in fMRI speech and motor paradigms.

Authors:  Jonathan P Farthing; Jacqueline Cummine; Ron Borowsky; Philip D Chilibeck; Gord Binsted; Gordon E Sarty
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Robust preprocessing for stimulus-based functional MRI of the moving fetus.

Authors:  Wonsang You; Iordanis E Evangelou; Zungho Zun; Nickie Andescavage; Catherine Limperopoulos
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-04-05

8.  Localization of the motor and speech zones of the cerebral cortex by functional magnetic resonance tomography.

Authors:  S K Ternovoi; V E Sinitsyn; G Yu Evzikov; S P Morozov; B V Kholodov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-06

9.  SimPACE: generating simulated motion corrupted BOLD data with synthetic-navigated acquisition for the development and evaluation of SLOMOCO: a new, highly effective slicewise motion correction.

Authors:  Erik B Beall; Mark J Lowe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Evaluation of preprocessing steps to compensate for magnetic field distortions due to body movements in BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Robert L Barry; Joy M Williams; L Martyn Klassen; Jason P Gallivan; Jody C Culham; Ravi S Menon
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.