Literature DB >> 17119948

Functional MRI of the cervical spinal cord on 1.5 T with fingertapping: to what extent is it feasible?

N Govers1, J Béghin, J W M Van Goethem, J Michiels, L van den Hauwe, E Vandervliet, P M Parizel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Until recently, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) contrast, was mainly used to study brain physiology. The activation signal measured with fMRI is based upon the changes in the concentration of deoxyhaemoglobin that arise from an increase in blood flow in the vicinity of neuronal firing. Technical limitations have impeded such research in the human cervical spinal cord. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether a reliable fMRI signal can be elicited from the cervical spinal cord during fingertapping, a complex motor activity. Furthermore, we wanted to determine whether the fMRI signal could be spatially localized to the particular neuroanatomical location specific for this task.
METHODS: A group of 12 right-handed healthy volunteers performed the complex motor task of fingertapping with their right hand. T2*-weighted gradient-echo echo-planar imaging on a 1.5-T clinical unit was used to image the cervical spinal cord. Motion correction was applied. Cord activation was measured in the transverse imaging plane, between the spinal cord levels C5 and T1.
RESULTS: In all subjects spinal cord responses were found, and in most of them on the left and the right side. The distribution of the activation response showed important variations between the subjects. While regions of activation were distributed throughout the spinal cord, concentrated activity was found at the anatomical location of expected motor innervation, namely nerve root C8, in 6 of the 12 subjects.
CONCLUSION: fMRI of the human cervical spinal cord on an 1.5-T unit detects neuronal activity related to a complex motor task. The location of the neuronal activation (spinal cord segment C5 through T1 with a peak on C8) corresponds to the craniocaudal anatomical location of the neurons that activate the muscles in use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17119948     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-006-0162-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  30 in total

Review 1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging: imaging techniques and contrast mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Howseman; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Statistical analysis of multi-subject fMRI data: assessment of focal activations.

Authors:  V Bosch
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human cervical spinal cord with stimulation of different sensory dermatomes.

Authors:  P W Stroman; V Krause; K L Malisza; U N Frankenstein; B Tomanek
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Tactile stimulation during finger opposition does not contribute to 3D fMRI brain activity pattern.

Authors:  J M Jansma; N F Ramsey; R S Kahn
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-02-16       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation.

Authors:  F Z Yetkin; T L McAuliffe; R Cox; V M Haughton
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor activation in the human cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  T Yoshizawa; T Nose; G J Moore; L O Sillerud
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Oscillatory motion of the normal cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  D J Mikulis; M L Wood; O A Zerdoner; B P Poncelet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Ogawa; D W Tank; R Menon; J M Ellermann; S G Kim; H Merkle; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Functional localization of brainstem and cervical spinal cord nuclei in humans with fMRI.

Authors:  Barry R Komisaruk; Kristine M Mosier; Wen-Ching Liu; Cecily Criminale; Laszlo Zaborszky; Beverly Whipple; Andrew Kalnin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Hemodynamic response changes in cerebrovascular disease: implications for functional MR imaging.

Authors:  Leo M Carusone; Jayashree Srinivasan; Darren R Gitelman; M Marsel Mesulam; Todd B Parrish
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Potential clinical applications for spinal functional MRI.

Authors:  Jennifer Kornelsen; Sean Mackey
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2007-06

2.  Spinal fMRI during proprioceptive and tactile tasks in healthy subjects: Activity detected using cross-correlation, general linear model and independent component analysis.

Authors:  P Valsasina; F Agosta; D Caputo; P W Stroman; M Filippi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Resting state networks in human cervical spinal cord observed with fMRI.

Authors:  Pengxu Wei; Jianjun Li; Feng Gao; Derong Ye; Qin Zhong; Shujia Liu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Lateralization of cervical spinal cord activity during an isometric upper extremity motor task with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth A Weber; Yufen Chen; Xue Wang; Thorsten Kahnt; Todd B Parrish
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Tactile sensory and pain networks in the human spinal cord and brain stem mapped by means of functional MR imaging.

Authors:  N F Ghazni; C M Cahill; P W Stroman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Tactile-associated fMRI recruitment of the cervical cord in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Federica Agosta; Paola Valsasina; Domenico Caputo; Maria A Rocca; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice.

Authors:  Constanze Lenschow; Ana Rita P Mendes; Susana Q Lima
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.342

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.