Literature DB >> 18274756

Functional BOLD MRI: comparison of different field strengths in a motor task.

T Meindl1, C Born, S Britsch, M Reiser, S Schoenberg.   

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the benefit of an increased field strength for functional magnetic resonance imaging in a motor task. Six right-handed volunteers were scanned at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using a motor task. Each experiment consisted of two runs with four activation blocks, each with right- and left-hand tapping. Analysis was done using BrainVoyagerQX. Differences between both field strengths concerning signal to noise (SNR), blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal change, functional sensitivity and BOLD contrast to noise (CNR) were tested using a paired t test. Delineation of activations and artifacts were graded by two independent readers. Results were further validated by means of a phantom study. The sensorimotor and premotor cortex, the supplementary motor area, subcortical and cerebellar structures were activated at each field strength. Additional activations of the right premotor cortex and right superior temporal gyrus were found at 3.0 T. Signal-to-noise, percentage of BOLD signal change, BOLD CNR and functional sensitivity improved at 3.0 T by a factor of up to 2.4. Functional imaging at 3.0 T results in detection of additional activated areas, increased SNR, BOLD signal change, functional sensitivity and BOLD CNR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18274756     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0869-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

1.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Krüger; A Kastrup; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The cerebellum and parietal cortex play a specific role in coordination: a PET study.

Authors:  N Ramnani; I Toni; R E Passingham; P Haggard
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Laterality, somatotopy and reproducibility of the basal ganglia and motor cortex during motor tasks.

Authors:  V H Scholz; A W Flaherty; E Kraft; J R Keltner; K K Kwong; Y I Chen; B R Rosen; B G Jenkins
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Motor control in basal ganglia circuits using fMRI and brain atlas approaches.

Authors:  Stéphane Lehéricy; Eric Bardinet; Leon Tremblay; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Jean-Baptiste Pochon; Didier Dormont; Dae-Shik Kim; Jerome Yelnik; Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: parallel-acquired inhomogeneity-desensitized fMRI.

Authors:  Benedikt A Poser; Maarten J Versluis; Johannes M Hoogduin; David G Norris
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  3.0-T functional brain imaging: a 5-year experience.

Authors:  T Scarabino; G M Giannatempo; T Popolizio; M Tosetti; V d'Alesio; F Esposito; F Di Salle; A Di Costanzo; A Bertolino; A Maggialetti; U Salvolini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters.

Authors:  Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Functional coupling and regional activation of human cortical motor areas during simple, internally paced and externally paced finger movements.

Authors:  C Gerloff; J Richard; J Hadley; A E Schulman; M Honda; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Cortical motor representation of the ipsilateral hand and arm.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; A Pascual-Leone; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Ogawa; D W Tank; R Menon; J M Ellermann; S G Kim; H Merkle; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  The impact of physiologic noise correction applied to functional MRI of pain at 1.5 and 3.0 T.

Authors:  Keith M Vogt; James W Ibinson; Petra Schmalbrock; Robert H Small
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Functional MR imaging on an open 1T MR imaging system: exploiting the advantages of an open MR imaging system for functional MR imaging.

Authors:  E van de Giessen; P F C Groot; J Booij; W van den Brink; D J Veltman; A J Nederveen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  The auditory midbrain of people with tinnitus: abnormal sound-evoked activity revisited.

Authors:  Jennifer R Melcher; Robert A Levine; Christopher Bergevin; Barbara Norris
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Hippocampal volumetry and functional MRI of memory in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton; Marc Korczykowski; Paul A Yushkevich; Kathy Lawler; John Pluta; Simon Glynn; Joseph I Tracy; Ronald L Wolf; Michael R Sperling; Jacqueline A French; John A Detre
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 2.937

5.  Using hypnotic suggestion to model loss of control and awareness of movements: an exploratory FMRI study.

Authors:  Quinton Deeley; Eamonn Walsh; David A Oakley; Vaughan Bell; Cristina Koppel; Mitul A Mehta; Peter W Halligan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sensitivity to white matter FMRI activation increases with field strength.

Authors:  Erin L Mazerolle; Jodie R Gawryluk; Kim N H Dillen; Steven A Patterson; Kirk W Feindel; Steven D Beyea; M Tynan R Stevens; Aaron J Newman; Matthias H Schmidt; Ryan C N D'Arcy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.