Literature DB >> 8057799

Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain.

J V Hajnal1, R Myers, A Oatridge, J E Schwieso, I R Young, G M Bydder.   

Abstract

To assess the effect of stimulus correlated motion on the appearance of functional magnetic resonance images, conventional visual and motor protocols were each performed by four normal volunteers and an image co-registration technique was used to retrospectively monitor subject motion. In three studies synthetic data sets were constructed from single baseline images using the positional information obtained from the co-registration procedure. Cumulative difference images were then created from both the synthetic and functional image sets. Stimulus correlated motion was detected in all eight studies and the synthetic cumulative difference images showed striking similarities to the equivalent functional images in each case.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8057799     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910310307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  88 in total

1.  Assessment of functional MR imaging in neurosurgical planning.

Authors:  C C Lee; H A Ward; F W Sharbrough; F B Meyer; W R Marsh; C Raffel; E L So; G D Cascino; C Shin; Y Xu; S J Riederer; C R Jack
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging. II. Signal detection and statistical inference.

Authors:  K M Petersson; T E Nichols; J B Poline; A P Holmes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Functional MRI for presurgical planning: problems, artefacts, and solution strategies.

Authors:  T Krings; M H Reinges; S Erberich; S Kemeny; V Rohde; U Spetzger; M Korinth; K Willmes; J M Gilsbach; A Thron
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Task-correlated head movement in fMR imaging: false activations can contaminate results despite motion correction.

Authors:  J E Desmond; S W Atlas
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  [Functional magnetic resonance tomography (fMRI). 2: Data analysis and applications].

Authors:  L R Schad
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Quantification of fMRI artifact reduction by a novel plaster cast head holder.

Authors:  V Edward; C Windischberger; R Cunnington; M Erdler; R Lanzenberger; D Mayer; W Endl; R Beisteiner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Monitoring eye movements during fMRI tasks with echo planar images.

Authors:  Jason R Tregellas; Jody L Tanabe; David E Miller; Robert Freedman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Neuroadaptive responses to citalopram in rats using pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sakthivel Sekar; M Verhoye; J Van Audekerke; G Vanhoutte; Andrew S Lowe; Andrew M Blamire; Thomas Steckler; A Van der Linden; Mohammed Shoaib
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Physiological noise reduction using volumetric functional magnetic resonance inverse imaging.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Aapo Nummenmaa; Thomas Witzel; Jonathan R Polimeni; Thomas A Zeffiro; Fu-Nien Wang; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Changes in MRI signal intensity during hypercapnic challenge under conscious and anesthetized conditions.

Authors:  M E Brevard; T Q Duong; J A King; C F Ferris
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.