Literature DB >> 2871557

Seeing objects in motion.

D C Burr, J Ross, M C Morrone.   

Abstract

This paper reports estimates of the conjoint spatiotemporal tuning functions of the neural mechanisms of the human vision system which detect image motion. The functions were derived from measurements of the minimum contrast necessary to detect the direction of drift of a sinusoidal grating, in the presence of phase-reversed masking gratings of various spatial and temporal frequencies. A mask of similar spatial and temporal frequencies to the test grating reduces sensitivity considerably, whereas one differing greatly in spatial or temporal frequency has little or no effect. The results show that for test gratings drifting at 8 Hz, the tuning function is bandpass in both space and time, peaked at the temporal and spatial frequency (SF) of the test (SFs were 0.1, 1 or 5 c deg-1; c represents cycles throughout). For a grating of 5 c deg-1 drifting at 0.3 Hz, the function is bandpass in space but lowpass in time. Fourier transform of the frequency results yields a function in space-time which we term the 'spatiotemporal receptive field'. For movement detectors (bandpass in space and time) the fields comprise alternating ridges of opposing polarity, elongated in space-time along the preferred velocity axis of the detector. We suggest that this organization explains how detectors analyse form and motion concurrently and accounts, at least in part, for a variety of perceptual phenomena, including summation, reduction of motion smear, metacontrast, stroboscopic motion and spatiotemporal interpolation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2871557     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1986.0022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0950-1193


  37 in total

1.  Apparent position governs contour-element binding by the visual system.

Authors:  A Hayes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Spatial and temporal visual properties of single neurons in the feline anterior ectosylvian visual area.

Authors:  Attila Nagy; Gabriella Eördegh; György Benedek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Second-order motion without awareness: passive adaptation to second-order motion produces a motion aftereffect.

Authors:  David Whitney; David W Bressler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Speed dependence of tuning to one-dimensional features in V1.

Authors:  Ferenc Mechler; Ifije E Ohiorhenuan; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spatially asymmetric response to moving patterns in the visual cortex: re-examining the local sign hypothesis.

Authors:  David Whitney; David W Bressler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The perception of motion smear during eye and head movements.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Jianliang Tong; Murat Aydin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Spatiotopic coding and remapping in humans.

Authors:  David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Motion deblurring in human vision.

Authors:  D C Burr; M J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Velocity or spatial and temporal separation: a comment on Farrell.

Authors:  L B Stelmach; P J Hearty
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

10.  A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.