Literature DB >> 24403393

A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation.

M J Morgan1.   

Abstract

The traditional method of single stimuli for measuring perceptual illusions and context effects confounds perceptual effects with changes in the observer's decision criterion. By deciding consciously or unconsciously to select one of the two response alternatives more than the other when unsure of the correct response, the observer can shift his or her psychometric function in a manner indistinguishable from a genuine perceptual shift. Here, a spatial two-alternative forced-choice method is described to measure a perceptual aftereffect by its influence on the shape of the psychometric function rather than the mean. The method was tested by measuring the effect of motion adaptation on the apparent Vernier offset of stationary Gabor patterns. The shift due to adaptation was found to be comparable in size to the internal noise, estimated from the slope of the psychometric function. By moving the eyes between adaptation and test, it was determined that adaptation is retinotopic rather than spatiotopic.

Keywords:  methods; signal detection theory; visual adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24403393      PMCID: PMC3886440          DOI: 10.1167/4.1.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  22 in total

1.  Observers can voluntarily shift their psychometric functions without losing sensitivity.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Barbara Dillenburger; Sabine Raphael; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Why do shape aftereffects increase with eccentricity?

Authors:  Elena Gheorghiu; Frederick A A Kingdom; Jason Bell; Rick Gurnsey
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Wohlgemuth was right: distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect.

Authors:  Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers.

Authors:  Frank Jäkel; Felix A Wichmann
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is retinotopic.

Authors:  Tomas Knapen; Martin Rolfs; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A motion aftereffect from visual imagery of motion.

Authors:  Jonathan Winawer; Alexander C Huk; Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-10-22

7.  Shifts of the psychometric function: distinguishing bias from perceptual effects.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Motion adaptation does not depend on attention to the adaptor.

Authors:  Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Computation of relative numerosity of circular dot textures.

Authors:  Sabine Raphael; Barbara Dillenburger; Michael Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Spatiotopic perceptual maps in humans: evidence from motion adaptation.

Authors:  Marco Turi; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  16 in total

1.  Sensory and decision-making processes underlying perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Nathan Witthoft; Long Sha; Jonathan Winawer; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Spatial and Temporal Selectivity of Translational Glass Patterns Assessed With the Tilt After-Effect.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Adriano Contillo; Filippo Ghin; Rita Donato; Matthew J Foxwell; Daniel W Atkins; George Mather; Gianluca Campana
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-05-21

3.  Are high-level aftereffects perceptual?

Authors:  Katherine R Storrs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

4.  Decision-level adaptation in motion perception.

Authors:  George Mather; Rebecca J Sharman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 5.  Perisaccadic Updating of Visual Representations and Attentional States: Linking Behavior and Neurophysiology.

Authors:  Alexandria C Marino; James A Mazer
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-05

6.  Tilted frames of reference have similar effects on the perception of gravitational vertical and the planning of vertical saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Simon Grant; Dean Melmoth; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Low-level mediation of directionally specific motion aftereffects: Motion perception is not necessary.

Authors:  M J Morgan; K Schreiber; J A Solomon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Visual adaptation enhances action sound discrimination.

Authors:  Nick E Barraclough; Steve A Page; Bruce D Keefe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Psychophysical evidence for the number sense.

Authors:  David C Burr; Giovanni Anobile; Roberto Arrighi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Linking hypotheses underlying Class A and Class B methods.

Authors:  M J Morgan; D Melmoth; J A Solomon
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.