Literature DB >> 17188321

Sensitivity and configuration-specificity of orientation-defined texture processing in infants and adults.

Francesca Pei1, Mark W Pettet, Anthony M Norcia.   

Abstract

Here we use textures made up of widely spaced Gabor patches to compare infant and adult sensitivity to the global organization of the elements comprising the textures. Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) were recorded to alterations between random images and images containing varying proportions of patches that were of the same orientation. The patches were placed on rectangular, hexagonal or random lattices. Texture-specific responses were robust in adults and their VEP threshold was reached when 1-17% of the patches had the same orientation in the structured image. Infant thresholds were approximately 20-60%. While infants are capable of detecting the global structure of our textures, their sensitivity is low. In adults we found, unexpectedly, that sensitivity and response gain were higher for horizontal compared to vertical global orientations. Infant sensitivity was the same for the two orientations. Comparable orientation anisotropies have not been previously reported for gratings, suggesting that the Gabor-defined textures are tapping different mechanisms. There were small, but measurable effects of the lattice type in adults, with the rectangular lattice producing the largest responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17188321      PMCID: PMC1994821          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  65 in total

1.  Delayed maturation of receptive field center/surround mechanisms in V2.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Jianghe Zheng; Ichiro Watanabe; Ichiro Maruko; Hua Bi; Earl L Smith; Yuzo Chino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP.

Authors:  A M Norcia; C W Tyler; R D Hamer; W Wesemann
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Line segregation.

Authors:  J Beck; A Rosenfeld; R Ivry
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1989

4.  Texture fields and texture flows: sensitivity to differences.

Authors:  Y Hel Or; S W Zucker
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1989

5.  Evoked potential and preferential looking correlates of the oblique effect in 3-month-old infants.

Authors:  S Sokol; A Moskowitz; V Hansen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Effect of stimulus orientation on the latency and amplitude of the VEP.

Authors:  A Moskowitz; S Sokol
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Discrimination of orientation-defined texture edges.

Authors:  S S Wolfson; M S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Intrinsic laminar lattice connections in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  K S Rockland; J S Lund
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-05-20       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Effects of grating spatial orientation on visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F Logi; A Pellegrinetti; L Bonfiglio; O Baglini; G Siciliano; A Ludice; F Sartucci
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.209

View more
  5 in total

1.  Infant Preference for Natural Texture Statistics is Modulated by Contrast Polarity.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Rebecca Woods
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2014 May-Jun

2.  Piecing it together: infants' neural responses to face and object structure.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Chuan Hou; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Connecting the dots: how local structure affects global integration in infants.

Authors:  Melanie Palomares; Mark Pettet; Vladimir Vildavski; Chuan Hou; Anthony Norcia
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Development of sensitivity to global form and motion in macaque monkeys (Macaca nemestrina).

Authors:  Lynne Kiorpes; Tracy Price; Cynthia Hall-Haro; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Dynamics of absolute and relative disparity processing in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Milena Kaestner; Marissa L Evans; Yulan D Chen; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 7.400

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.