Literature DB >> 21630061

Interactions in the cochlea between air conduction and osseous and non-osseous bone conduction stimulation.

Cahtia Adelman1, Rachel Fraenkel, Leonid Kriksunov, Haim Sohmer.   

Abstract

Since air-conducted (AC) and clinical (mastoid) bone-conducted (BC) sounds interact in the cochlea (e.g. pitch, cancellation, masking, beats), it has been thought that both AC and BC stimulations lead to a mechanical wave in the cochlea. However, there are also "non-osseous" forms of BC, i.e. auditory sensation produced when the clinical bone vibrator is applied to "non-osseous" soft tissue sites. In the present study, such "non-osseous" sites were identified (e.g. eye, cheek, neck) and they interacted with AC and osseous BC (pitch matching, beats, masking), indicating that all of these forms of auditory stimulation converge in the cochlea, producing the same pattern of mechanical activity, leading to their interactions.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21630061     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1640-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  13 in total

1.  Bone conduction experiments in animals - evidence for a non-osseous mechanism.

Authors:  S Freeman; J Y Sichel; H Sohmer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Bone conduction thresholds and skull vibration measured on the teeth during stimulation at different sites on the human head.

Authors:  T Ito; C Röösli; C J Kim; J H Sim; A M Huber; R Probst
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Simultaneous cancellation of air and bone conduction tones at two frequencies: extension of the famous experiment by von Békésy.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Transmission pathways of vibratory stimulation as measured by subjective thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tomoo Watanabe; Sibylle Bertoli; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea?

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Neuronal coding by cortical cells of the frequency of oscillating peripheral stimuli.

Authors:  J Hyvarinen; H Sakata; W H Talbot; V B Mountcastle
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Bone conduction experiments in humans - a fluid pathway from bone to ear.

Authors:  H Sohmer; S Freeman; M Geal-Dor; C Adelman; I Savion
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  6 in total

1.  Air, bone and soft tissue excitation of the cochlea in the presence of severe impediments to ossicle and window mobility.

Authors:  Ronen Perez; Cahtia Adelman; Shai Chordekar; Reuven Ishai; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Reflections on the role of a traveling wave along the basilar membrane in view of clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The impact of perilaryngeal vibration on the self-perception of loudness and the Lombard effect.

Authors:  François-Xavier Brajot; Don Nguyen; Jeffrey DiGiovanni; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.

Authors:  Shai Chordekar; Cahtia Adelman; Haim Sohmer; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

5.  Hearing at threshold intensities: by slow mechanical traveling waves or by fast cochlear fluid pressure waves.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2020-08-06

Review 6.  Soft Tissue Conduction: Review, Mechanisms, and Implications.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.