Literature DB >> 24452773

Air, bone and soft tissue excitation of the cochlea in the presence of severe impediments to ossicle and window mobility.

Ronen Perez1, Cahtia Adelman2,3, Shai Chordekar4, Reuven Ishai5, Haim Sohmer6.   

Abstract

Clinical conditions have been described in which one of the two cochlear windows is immobile (otosclerosis) or absent (round window atresia), but nevertheless bone conduction (BC) thresholds are relatively unaffected. To clarify this apparent paradox, experimental manipulations which would severely impede several of the classical osseous mechanisms of BC were induced in fat sand rats, including discontinuity or immobilization of the ossicular chain, coupled with window fixation. Effects of these manipulations were assessed by recording auditory nerve brainstem evoked response (ABR) thresholds to stimulation by air conduction (AC), by osseous BC and by non-osseous BC (also called soft tissue conduction-STC) in which the BC bone vibrator is applied to skin sites. Following the immobilization, discontinuity and window fixation, auditory stimulation was also delivered to cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) and to saline applied to the middle ear cavity. While the manipulations (immobilization, discontinuity, window fixation) led to an elevation of AC thresholds, nevertheless, there was no change in osseous and non-osseous BC thresholds. On the other hand, ABR could be elicited in response to fluid pressure stimulation to CSF and middle ear saline, even in the presence of the severe restriction of ossicular chain and window mobility. The results of these experiments in which osseous and non-osseous BC thresholds remained unchanged in the presence of severe restriction of the classical middle ear mechanisms and in the absence of an efficient release window, while ABR could be recorded in response to fluid pressure auditory stimulation to fluid sites, indicate that it is possible that the inner ear may be activated at low sound intensities by fast fluid pressure stimulation. At higher sound intensities, a slower passive basilar membrane traveling wave may serve to excite the inner ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24452773     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-2887-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  29 in total

1.  Mutual cancellation between tones presented by air conduction, by bone conduction and by non-osseous (soft tissue) bone conduction.

Authors:  Shai Chordekar; Leonid Kriksunov; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Cahtia Adelman; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Bone conduction thresholds and skull vibration measured on the teeth during stimulation at different sites on the human head.

Authors:  T Ito; C Röösli; C J Kim; J H Sim; A M Huber; R Probst
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs) in patients with severe to profound bilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Sally M Rosengren; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Transmission pathways of vibratory stimulation as measured by subjective thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tomoo Watanabe; Sibylle Bertoli; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Interactions in the cochlea between air conduction and osseous and non-osseous bone conduction stimulation.

Authors:  Cahtia Adelman; Rachel Fraenkel; Leonid Kriksunov; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Experimental confirmation that vibrations at soft tissue conduction sites induce hearing by way of a new mode of auditory stimulation.

Authors:  Marrigje de Jong; Ronen Perez; Cahtia Adelman; Shai Chordekar; Melissa Rubin; Leonid Kriksunov; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08-26

7.  Comparison of umbo velocity in air- and bone-conduction.

Authors:  Christof Röösli; David Chhan; Christopher Halpin; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Surgical anatomy of the ear of the fat sand rat.

Authors:  J Y Sichel; M Plotnik; L Cherny; H Sohmer; J Elidan
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1999-08

9.  Round window atresia in association with congenital stapes fixation.

Authors:  D G Pappas; D G Pappas; G Hedlin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  High-multiple spontaneous otoacoustic emissions confirm theory of local tuned oscillators.

Authors:  Martin Braun
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-03-27
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Reflections on the role of a traveling wave along the basilar membrane in view of clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Relation between Body Structure and Hearing during Soft Tissue Auditory Stimulation.

Authors:  Cahtia Adelman; Michal Kaufmann Yehezkely; Shai Chordekar; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Hearing at threshold intensities: by slow mechanical traveling waves or by fast cochlear fluid pressure waves.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2020-08-06

Review 4.  Soft Tissue Conduction: Review, Mechanisms, and Implications.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.