Literature DB >> 24740735

Reflections on the role of a traveling wave along the basilar membrane in view of clinical and experimental findings.

Haim Sohmer1.   

Abstract

Air conduction (AC) is accompanied by displacements of the two cochlear windows, bulk fluid flow between them, a pressure difference across the basilar membrane, leading to a passive traveling wave along the membrane, which activates the cochlear amplifier and enhances the displacements. AC interacts with bone conduction (BC) stimulation, so that it has been assumed that BC stimulation also involves a passive traveling wave. However, several clinical conditions and experimental manipulations provide evidence that a passive traveling wave may not be involved in BC stimulation at low intensities. Soft tissue conduction (STC) (also called non-osseous bone conduction) involves applying the bone vibrator to soft tissues on the head, neck and thorax, eliciting auditory sensation. STC stimulation probably does not involve a passive traveling wave. This review presents clinical conditions and experimental manipulations which assess the contributions of AC, BC and STC stimulation to the passive traveling wave. Evidence from the clinic (otosclerosis, round window atresia) and from the laboratory (holes in the wall of the inner ear, immobilization of the ossicular chain and the windows, discontinuity of the chain, measurement of basilar membrane displacements in the absence of the cochlear amplifier) lead to the conclusion that a passive basilar membrane traveling wave may not be involved in stimulation at low sound intensities. It is suggested that at low sound levels, the outer hair cell cochlear amplifier may not be activated by a passive traveling wave, but may be directly activated by the fast cochlear fluid pressures induced by AC, BC and STC stimulation. On the other hand, at high intensities, the cochlea is activated by the slow passive traveling wave.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24740735     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3045-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  34 in total

1.  Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Mutual cancellation between tones presented by air conduction, by bone conduction and by non-osseous (soft tissue) bone conduction.

Authors:  Shai Chordekar; Leonid Kriksunov; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Cahtia Adelman; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Bone conduction thresholds and skull vibration measured on the teeth during stimulation at different sites on the human head.

Authors:  T Ito; C Röösli; C J Kim; J H Sim; A M Huber; R Probst
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Sound induced fluid pressures directly activate vestibular hair cells: implications for activation of the cochlea.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs) in patients with severe to profound bilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Sally M Rosengren; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Transmission pathways of vibratory stimulation as measured by subjective thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tomoo Watanabe; Sibylle Bertoli; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Mechanical properties of sensory hair bundles are reflected in their Brownian motion measured with a laser differential interferometer.

Authors:  W Denk; W W Webb; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Comparison of umbo velocity in air- and bone-conduction.

Authors:  Christof Röösli; David Chhan; Christopher Halpin; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Semicircular canal fenestration - improvement of bone- but not air-conducted auditory thresholds.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer; Sharon Freeman; Ronen Perez
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  High-multiple spontaneous otoacoustic emissions confirm theory of local tuned oscillators.

Authors:  Martin Braun
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-03-27
View more
  1 in total

1.  Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.

Authors:  Shai Chordekar; Cahtia Adelman; Haim Sohmer; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.