Literature DB >> 10873197

Determination of appropriate RF blocking impedance for MRI surface coils and arrays.

A Kocharian1, P J Rossman, T C Hulshizer, J P Felmlee, S J Riederer.   

Abstract

Surface and phased array receiving coils in MRI typically require that RF excitation be accomplished using the body coil. This process requires that the receiving coils contain blocking circuitry to increase the overall circuit impedance during RF excitation and withstand the electromotive force induced by the applied electromagnetic field. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal impedance range required during RF excitation based on an assessment of image quality. The experimental results are fit by an exponential model and establish criteria that can be applied for general receiver coil design.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10873197     DOI: 10.1007/bf02601842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  12 in total

1.  The NMR phased array.

Authors:  P B Roemer; W A Edelstein; C E Hayes; S P Souza; O M Mueller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  The design of RF systems for patient safety.

Authors:  J R Fitzsimmons
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-03-31       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Surface coil phased arrays for high-resolution imaging of the carotid arteries.

Authors:  C E Hayes; C M Mathis; C Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  K K Yu; H Hricak; L L Subak; C J Zaloudek; C B Powell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Phase alignment of multiple surface coil data for reduced bandwidth and reconstruction requirements.

Authors:  J P Debbins; J P Felmlee; S J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Active coil isolation in NMR imaging and spectroscopy using PIN diodes and tuned transmission line: a practical approach.

Authors:  P M Mellor; D R Checkley
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Pelvic imaging with phased-array coils: quantitative assessment of signal-to-noise ratio improvement.

Authors:  C E Hayes; M J Dietz; B F King; R L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Value of endorectal coil versus body coil MRI for diagnosis of recurrent pelvic malignancies.

Authors:  R A Huch Böni; C Meyenberger; J Pok Lundquist; F Trinkler; U Lütolf; G P Krestin
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

9.  MR imaging of the abdomen with a phased-array multicoil: prospective clinical evaluation.

Authors:  N G Campeau; C D Johnson; J P Felmlee; J N Rydberg; R K Butts; R L Ehman; S J Riederer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Comparison of phased-array and body coils for MR imaging of liver.

Authors:  L H Schwartz; D M Panicek; E Thomson; S K Herman; G V Shah; R T Heelan; Y Fong; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  1 in total

1.  Depletion-Mode GaN HEMT Q-Spoil Switches for MRI Coils.

Authors:  Jonathan Y Lu; Thomas Grafendorfer; Tao Zhang; Shreyas Vasanawala; Fraser Robb; John M Pauly; Greig C Scott
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 10.048

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.