Literature DB >> 9725301

Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.

K K Yu1, H Hricak, L L Subak, C J Zaloudek, C B Powell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of invasive cervical cancer using the pelvic phased array coil in combination with fast spin-echo T2-weighted imaging and the body coil in combination with conventional spin-echo T2-weighted imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-four women (22-68 years old) with invasive cervical cancer underwent MR imaging (at 1.5 T) using a body coil conventional spin-echo protocol (n = 62) or a phased array coil fast spin-echo protocol (n = 32). Imaging preceded surgery by no more than 5 weeks. MR images were evaluated for tumor size, local stage, and nodal metastasis using surgical pathology as the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Overall staging accuracy for the body coil conventional spin-echo protocol (89%) was not significantly different from that of the phased array coil fast spin-echo protocol (91%). Both techniques also achieved similar accuracy in diagnosing parametrial invasion (95% versus 94%) and lymph node metastases (85% versus 91%) and in tumor sizing (correlation coefficient, .93 versus .94).
CONCLUSION: In the preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma by MR imaging, both the newer (phased array coil fast spin-echo protocol) and the older (body coil conventional spin-echo protocol) techniques achieved similarly high accuracies in local staging, assessment of parametrial invasion, and evaluation of tumor size. Decreased imaging time and increased image resolution are advantages of the newer technique, although in our series they did not increase staging accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9725301     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.3.9725301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  Determination of appropriate RF blocking impedance for MRI surface coils and arrays.

Authors:  A Kocharian; P J Rossman; T C Hulshizer; J P Felmlee; S J Riederer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Efficacy of transvaginal contrast-enhanced MRI in the early staging of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Deniz Akata; Ulku Kerimoglu; Tuncay Hazirolan; Musturay Karcaaltincaba; Faruk Köse; Mustafa N Ozmen; Okan Akhan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Cervical cancer: MR imaging findings before, during, and after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Gulgun Engin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Clinical significance of tumor volume and lymph node involvement assessed by MRI in stage IIB cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Dae Woo Lee; Young Tae Kim; Jae Hoon Kim; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Jae Wook Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 5.  Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maarten G Thomeer; Cees Gerestein; Sandra Spronk; Helena C van Doorn; Els van der Ham; Myriam G Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara J Selman; Christopher Mann; Javier Zamora; Tracy-Louise Appleyard; Khalid Khan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological diseases.

Authors:  Tomohiro Namimoto; Kazuo Awai; Takeshi Nakaura; Yumi Yanaga; Toshinori Hirai; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Evaluation of the indications for performing magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis at a referral center for cancer, according to the American College of Radiology criteria.

Authors:  Camila Silva Boaventura; Daniel Padilha Rodrigues; Olimpio Antonio Cornehl Silva; Fabrício Henrique Beltrani; Rayssa Araruna Bezerra de Melo; Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt; Gustavo Gomes Mendes; Rubens Chojniak
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

9.  Uterine cervical malignancy: diagnostic accuracy of MRI with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Mohammed A Shweel; Enas A Abdel-Gawad; Ehab Ali Abdel-Gawad; Hosny S Abdelghany; Alshimaa M Abdel-Rahman; Emad M Ibrahim
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2012-07-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.