Literature DB >> 25386412

Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry in plain anterior-posterior radiograph in eastern-Indian population.

Sanchita Roy1, Rajib Kundu2, Shyamalendu Medda3, Avanish Gupta1, Baljit Kaur Nanrah1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The morphologic features of the proximal femur are used in preoperative planning prior to total hip arthroplasty. The standard commercially available marketed prostheses sometimes may not be the best fit to all subjects because of the large anatomic variation among different population. Orthopaedic surgeons always stress the need for a proper implant-patient match in hip joint replacements to avoid post-operative complication of mismatch which may affect the ultimate outcome of the operation. AIM: The present study was undertaken to measure the important parameters of upper end of femur in elderly Eastern Indian population which will help the prosthetist to manufacture ideal implant for the local population. This will also help the orthopaedic surgeons while positioning the implants during total hip replacement (THR) procedure in this population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements were made on both sides, left and right from anterior-posterior radiograph of 102 subject (>50yrs, 42 male and 60 females) using AGFA software. Three parameters femoral head diameter (FHD), neck-shaft angle (NSA) and horizontal off-set (HO) were measured.
RESULTS: SPSS software used for data analysis. Gender- wise no significant differences were found in NSA and FHD, but HO was significantly lower in female than that of male (p<.05).The values on both sides didn't differ significantly.
CONCLUSION: Improved knowledge of the morphology of the proximal femora will assist the surgeon in restoring the geometry of the proximal femur during total hip arthroplasty and the data could be used as a guideline to design a more suitable implant for Eastern Indian population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Neck-shaft angle; Offset; Proximal femur; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2014        PMID: 25386412      PMCID: PMC4225864          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9269.4852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  16 in total

1.  Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering.

Authors:  Banchong Mahaisavariya; Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip; Trongtum Tongdee; Erik L J Bohez; Jos Vander Sloten; Philip Oris
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Hip axis length in mid-life Japanese and Caucasian U.S. residents: no evidence for an ethnic difference.

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; Jean T Young; Mei-Hua Huang; Alexander Bucur; Yan Wang; Teresa Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry using digital photographs.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Paul Toogood; Daniel Hart; Daniel Cooperman; Richard E Grant
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  Sex and ethnic differences in bone architecture.

Authors:  Dorothy A Nelson; Mary S Megyesi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur.

Authors:  O Husmann; P J Rubin; P F Leyvraz; B de Roguin; J N Argenson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Geometric indices of bone strength are associated with physical activity and dietary calcium intake in healthy older women.

Authors:  Michelle K Nurzenski; N Kathryn Briffa; Roger I Price; Benjamin C C Khoo; Amanda Devine; Thomas J Beck; Richard L Prince
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Hip geometry, bone mineral distribution, and bone strength in European men and women: the EPOS study.

Authors:  N Crabtree; M Lunt; G Holt; H Kröger; H Burger; S Grazio; K T Khaw; R S Lorenc; J Nijs; J Stepan; J A Falch; T Miazgowski; P Raptou; H A Pols; J Dequeker; S Havelka; K Hoszowski; I Jajic; S Czekalski; G Lyritis; A J Silman; J Reeve
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning.

Authors:  M Maruyama; J R Feinberg; W N Capello; J A D'Antonio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B J McGrory; B F Morrey; T D Cahalan; K N An; M E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-11

10.  Anthropometric measurements to design best-fit femoral stem for the Indian population.

Authors:  Br Rawal; Rahul Ribeiro; Rajesh Malhotra; Naresh Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.251

View more
  4 in total

1.  Morphometry of Proximal Femur in Indian Population.

Authors:  Minakshi Verma; Sheetal Joshi; Anita Tuli; Shashi Raheja; Priyanka Jain; Priyanka Srivastava
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  A comparative radiographic morphometric analysis to assess the normal radiological morphology of the adult hip in indian population.

Authors:  Balaji Zacharia; K Mohammed Fawas
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-17

3.  Femoral version, neck-shaft angle, and acetabular anteversion in Chinese Han population: a retrospective analysis of 466 healthy adults.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Lin Peng; Mohammed Al-Qwbani; Guo-Ping Xie; Qin-Meng Yang; Yu Chai; Qing Zhang; Bin Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Anthropometric analysis of the hip joint in South Indian population using computed tomography.

Authors:  Vetrivel Chezian Sengodan; Elangovan Sinmayanantham; J Saravana Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.