Literature DB >> 21881968

Geometric indices of hip bone strength in obese, overweight, and normal-weight adolescent boys.

R El Hage1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to compare hip bone strength indices in obese, overweight, and normal-weight adolescent boys using hip structure analysis. After adjusting for weight, obese boys displayed lower intertrochanteric cross-sectional moment of inertia and femoral shaft cross-sectional moment of inertia and section modulus in comparison to normal-weight and overweight boys. This study suggests that in obese adolescent boys, femoral shaft bending strength is not adapted to the increased body weight.
INTRODUCTION: The influence of being obese or overweight on bone strength in adolescents remains controversial. The main aim of this study was to compare hip bone strength indices in obese, overweight, and normal-weight adolescent boys using hip structure analysis. The second aim of this study was to explore the influence of lean mass and fat mass on hip bone strength indices in the same population.
METHODS: This study included 70 adolescent boys (25 obese, 25 normal weight, and 20 overweight). The three groups (obese, overweight, and normal weight) were matched for maturity (Tanner stage) and age. Body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). To evaluate hip bone strength, DXA scans were analyzed at the femoral neck (FN), the intertochanteric (IT), and the femoral shaft (FS) by the Hip Structure Analysis (HSA) program. Cross-sectional area (CSA), an index of axial compression strength, section modulus (Z), an index of bending strength, and cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), an index of structural rigidity were measured from bone mass profiles.
RESULTS: Body weight, lean mass, fat mass and BMI were significantly higher in obese and overweight boys in comparison to normal-weight boys (P < 0.05). Total hip (TH) BMD and femoral neck (FN) BMD were significantly higher in obese and overweight boys in comparison to normal-weight boys (P < 0.05). After adjusting for age or maturation index, obese and overweight boys displayed significantly higher TH and FN BMD, CSA, CSMI, and Z of the three sites (FN, IT, and FS) in comparison to normal-weight boys (P < 0.05). However, after adjusting for weight, obese boys displayed significantly lower IT CSMI and FS CSMI and Z in comparison to normal-weight and overweight boys (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that in obese adolescent boys, intertrochanteric structural rigidity and femoral shaft structural rigidity and bending strength are not adapted to the increased body weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21881968     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1754-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  54 in total

1.  Lack of efficacy of a food-frequency questionnaire in assessing dietary macronutrient intakes in subjects consuming diets of known composition.

Authors:  E J Schaefer; J L Augustin; M M Schaefer; H Rasmussen; J M Ordovas; G E Dallal; J T Dwyer
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Hormonal and metabolic consequences of childhood obesity.

Authors:  Evelyn Artz; Andrea Haqq; Michael Freemark
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women's health initiative-observational study.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck; Moira A Petit; Guanglin Wu; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane A Cauley; Zhao Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Femoral bone structural geometry adapts to mechanical loading and is influenced by sex steroids: the Penn State Young Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Moira A Petit; Thomas J Beck; Hung-Mo Lin; Christy Bentley; Richard S Legro; Tom Lloyd
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Overweight children have a greater proportion of fat mass relative to muscle mass in the upper limbs than in the lower limbs: implications for bone strength at the distal forearm.

Authors:  Gaele Ducher; Shona L Bass; Geraldine A Naughton; Prisca Eser; Richard D Telford; Robin M Daly
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Sexual dimorphism of the femoral neck during the adolescent growth spurt: a structural analysis.

Authors:  Mark R Forwood; Donald A Bailey; Thomas J Beck; Robert L Mirwald; Adam D G Baxter-Jones; Kirsti Uusi-Rasi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Bone mineral density in prepubertal obese and control children: relation to body weight, lean mass, and fat mass.

Authors:  Emilie Rocher; Christine Chappard; Christelle Jaffre; Claude-Laurent Benhamou; Daniel Courteix
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Physical activity and femoral neck bone strength during childhood: the Iowa Bone Development Study.

Authors:  Kathleen F Janz; Julie M Eichenberger Gilmore; Steven M Levy; Elena M Letuchy; Trudy L Burns; Thomas J Beck
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Bone mineral mass in overweight and obese children: diminished or enhanced?

Authors:  K J Ellis; R J Shypailo; W W Wong; S A Abrams
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.280

10.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey.

Authors:  T J Cole; M C Bellizzi; K M Flegal; W H Dietz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  Saturation Effect of Body Mass Index on Bone Mineral Density in Adolescents of Different Ages: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Yujuan Ouyang; Yingping Quan; Chengyi Guo; Songlin Xie; Changxiong Liu; Xiongjie Huang; Xinfeng Huang; Yanming Chen; Xiangjun Xiao; Nengqian Ma; Ruijie Xie
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Fat Mass Is Positively Associated with Estimated Hip Bone Strength among Chinese Men Aged 50 Years and above with Low Levels of Lean Mass.

Authors:  Guiyuan Han; Yu-Ming Chen; Hua Huang; Zhanyong Chen; Lipeng Jing; Su-Mei Xiao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Functional relevance for associations between osteoporosis and genetic variants.

Authors:  Kun Liu; Li-Jun Tan; Peng Wang; Xiang-Ding Chen; Li-Hua Zhu; Qin Zeng; Yuan Hu; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The association of genetic variants in FGFR2 with osteoporosis susceptibility in Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Mengxue Fei; Xinying Zhou; Yuejun Li; Dadi Jin
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Associations of Age, BMI, and Years of Menstruation with Proximal Femur Strength in Chinese Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Huili Kang; Yu-Ming Chen; Guiyuan Han; Hua Huang; Wei-Qing Chen; Xidan Wang; Ying-Ying Zhu; Su-Mei Xiao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.