Literature DB >> 10848030

Does knowledge make a difference? The association between knowledge about genes and attitudes toward gene tests.

P Jallinoja1, A R Aro.   

Abstract

A survey was conducted (n = 1,216) to evaluate the level of knowledge about basic facts of genetics and attitudes toward gene tests among the Finnish population. Our results show that a majority of the Finnish population generally approved of gene tests. Well over half of the respondents believed that genetic testing will have positive consequences, but many also had worries related to the development of gene tests. We showed that there was an association between knowledge and attitudes, but better knowledge did not simply lead to unambiguous acceptance. Among those with the highest level of knowledge there was in many respects both more enthusiasm and more skepticism than among those with the lowest level of knowledge. Those with a low level of knowledge had more difficulties in taking a stance toward attitude statements. In general, steps should be taken, first, to increase citizens' capabilities to seek and understand information about genetics and specific diseases when faced with a need for it. Second, steps should be taken to provide citizens with tools to perceive and discuss potential ethical and social problems, which development of gene technology, genetic testing, and screening bring along. Sites for these enterprises could be the biology school curriculum, genetic counseling, media, as well as health education and health communication in general.

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10848030     DOI: 10.1080/10810730050019546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  42 in total

1.  Principles of risk perception applied to gene technology.

Authors:  Lennart Sjöberg
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Genetic Testing and Genetic Counselors in Jordan: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Majd Soubani; Lana Abu Salem; Haneen Saker; Muayyad Ahmad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing in those affected with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Tracey M Scuffham; Aideen McInerny-Leo; Shu-Kay Ng; George Mellick
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-09-10

4.  Community engagement about genetic variation research.

Authors:  Sharon F Terry; Kurt D Christensen; Susan Metosky; Gayle Rudofsky; Kathleen P Deignan; Hulda Martinez; Penelope Johnson-Moore; Toby Citrin
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  Promoting public awareness and engagement in genome sciences.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Katie D Rosanbalm; Larry Boles; Genevieve M Tindall; Troy M Livingston; Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Measuring genetic knowledge: a brief survey instrument for adolescents and adults.

Authors:  S M Fitzgerald-Butt; A Bodine; K M Fry; J Ash; A N Zaidi; V Garg; C A Gerhardt; K L McBride
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Eric Vermeulen; Carla G van El; Liesbeth Claassen; Danielle R M Timmermans; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Educational challenges of molecular life science: Characteristics and implications for education and research.

Authors:  Lena A E Tibell; Carl-Johan Rundgren
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Public trust in genomic risk assessment for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; William Barry; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.