Literature DB >> 10834905

Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.

M Ryan1, S Farrar.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 10834905      PMCID： PMC1118112          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit the views of health service users: an application to the patient health card.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan; Emma McIntosh; Phil Shackley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement.

Authors:  P D Cleary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

3.  Using discrete choice modelling in priority setting: an application to clinical service developments.

Authors:  S Farrar; M Ryan; D Ross; A Ludbrook
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  M Ryan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease.

Authors:  R H Harwood; A Rogers; E Dickinson; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

6.  Assessing utilities by means of conjoint measurement: an application in medical decision analysis.

Authors:  A Maas; L Stalpers
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1992 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management.

Authors:  M Ryan; J Hughes
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  S Vick; A Scott
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Establishing patient preferences for blood transfusion support: an application of conjoint analysis.

Authors:  M van der Pol; J Cairns
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1998-04

10.  Modelling the EuroQol data: a comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modelling.

Authors:  Z Hakim; D S Pathak
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.046
View more
  264 in total

1.  Health economic evaluation.

Authors:  A Shiell; C Donaldson; C Mitton; G Currie
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Factors that influence rheumatologists' decisions to escalate care in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a choice-based conjoint analysis.

Authors:  Wietske Kievit; Laura van Hulst; Piet van Riel; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Developing intermediate care provided by general practitioners with a special interest: the economic perspective.

Authors:  David P Kernick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Tara Maddala; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; F Reed Johnson; Tara Maddala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  What do hospital consultants value about their jobs? A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Cristina Ubach; Anthony Scott; Fiona French; Morag Awramenko; Gillian Needham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-28

7.  Discrete choice experiments in health care.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-14

Review 8.  Economic valuation of informal care. An overview of methods and applications.

Authors:  Bernard van den Berg; Werner B F Brouwer; Marc A Koopmanschap
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-02

9.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics. For better or for worse?

Authors:  Stirling Bryan; Paul Dolan
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-10

10.  Parental Considerations Regarding Cure and Late Effects for Children With Cancer.

Authors:  Katie A Greenzang; Hasan Al-Sayegh; Clement Ma; Mehdi Najafzadeh; Eve Wittenberg; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 7.124
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.