Literature DB >> 10180665

Establishing patient preferences for blood transfusion support: an application of conjoint analysis.

M van der Pol1, J Cairns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a method of determining the relative importance of waiting time and location of care for patients with haematological disorders requiring red cell transfusion. Such information is particularly relevant when evaluating interventions that affect patient well-being (e.g. by changing waiting time and location) but do not affect health outcomes.
METHODS: Conjoint analysis is used to assess the relative importance of waiting time and location with respect to pre-transfusion testing and red cell transfusion. Compensation is also included as an attribute in order to estimate the monetary value of changes in waiting time and location.
RESULTS: Waiting time and location are important attributes in the provision of pre-transfusion testing and red cell transfusion. Compensation is not an important attribute. On average patients are willing to wait an additional 45 minutes in order to have pre-transfusion testing in their own home and an additional 35 minutes in order to receive red cell transfusions in their preferred location.
CONCLUSION: The relative importance of waiting time and location of care was established. However, it was not possible to assign monetary values since compensation was not an important attribute for these respondents. The paper highlights the scope for using conjoint analysis to analyse the non-health benefits that may result from changes in the delivery of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10180665     DOI: 10.1177/135581969800300203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  11 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.

Authors:  M Ryan; S Farrar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

2.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics. For better or for worse?

Authors:  Stirling Bryan; Paul Dolan
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-10

3.  Quality of life and relative importance: a comparison of time trade-off and conjoint analysis methods in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  P A Aspinall; A R Hill; B Dhillon; A M Armbrecht; P Nelson; C Lumsden; E Farini-Hudson; R Brice; A Vickers; P Buchholz
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Using discrete choice experiments within a cost-benefit analysis framework: some considerations.

Authors:  Emma McIntosh
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  The willingness of US pediatric dentists to use atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) with their patients: a conjoint analysis.

Authors:  Elham Talib Kateeb; John Warren; Gary Gaeth; Peter Damiano; Elizabeth Momany; Michael J Kanellis; Karin Weber-Gasparoni; Timothy Ansley
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 1.821

7.  The importance of drug adverse effects compared with seizure control for people with epilepsy: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Andrew Lloyd; Emma McIntosh; Martin Price
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Assessing patients' preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: a conjoint analysis study.

Authors:  J Ratcliffe; R Van Haselen; M Buxton; K Hardy; J Colehan; M Partridge
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Cancer patients' willingness to pay for blood transfusions at home: results from a contingent valuation study in a French cancer network.

Authors:  Nathalie Havet; Magali Morelle; Raphaël Remonnay; Marie-Odile Carrere
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-10

10.  Views of older people on cataract surgery options: an assessment of preferences by conjoint analysis.

Authors:  M-A Ross; A J Avery; A J E Foss
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.