Literature DB >> 10185513

Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship.

S Vick1, A Scott.   

Abstract

Recently, some health economists have re-examined the nature of the agency relationship in health care. This paper presents a study conducted to establish the relative value to patients of various attributes of the general practice consultation. In the sample of patients recruited, the most important attribute was 'being able to talk to the doctor', whilst 'who chooses your treatment' was the least important. Although patients preferred more information to less, only females and highly qualified respondents preferred to choose the treatment themselves. The results of this study have implications for the education of doctors in communication skills and for further research into the agency relationship in health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10185513     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00035-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  57 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.

Authors:  M Ryan; S Farrar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

2.  Rural practice preferences among medical students in Ghana: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Margaret E Kruk; Jennifer C Johnson; Mawuli Gyakobo; Peter Agyei-Baffour; Kwesi Asabir; S Rani Kotha; Janet Kwansah; Emmanuel Nakua; Rachel C Snow; Mawuli Dzodzomenyo
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Equity in prevention and health care.

Authors:  V Lorant; B Boland; P Humblet; D Deliège
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Tara Maddala; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; F Reed Johnson; Tara Maddala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics. For better or for worse?

Authors:  Stirling Bryan; Paul Dolan
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-10

Review 7.  Assessing the efficiency of HIV prevention around the world: methods of the PANCEA project.

Authors:  Elliot Marseille; Lalit Dandona; Joseph Saba; Coline McConnel; Brandi Rollins; Paul Gaist; Mattias Lundberg; Mead Over; Stefano Bertozzi; James G Kahn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Counting the cost of fast access: using discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences in general practice.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan; Verity Watson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Which preferred providers are really preferred? Effectiveness of insurers' channeling incentives on pharmacy choice.

Authors:  Lieke H H M Boonen; Frederik T Schut; Bas Donkers; Xander Koolman
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-02-26

10.  Women's preferences for place of delivery in rural Tanzania: a population-based discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Margaret E Kruk; Magdalena Paczkowski; Godfrey Mbaruku; Helen de Pinho; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.