Literature DB >> 10171955

Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease.

R H Harwood1, A Rogers, E Dickinson, S Ebrahim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a handicap measurement scale in a self completion questionnaire format, with scale weights allowing quantification of handicap at an interval level of measurement.
DESIGN: Adaptation of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and handicaps into a practical questionnaire incorporating the dimensions of handicap mobility, occupation, physical independence, social integration, orientation, and economic self sufficiency and scale weights derived from interviews with a general population sample, with the technique of conjoint analysis.
SETTING: Two general practices in different areas of London.
SUBJECTS: 240 adults aged 55-74 years randomly selected from the practices, 101 (42%) of whom agreed to be interviewed, and 79 (78%) of whom completed the exercise. MAIN MEASURES: Rating of severity of handicap associated with 30 hypothetical health scenarios on a visual analogue scale, from which was derived a matrix of scale weights ("part utilities") relating to different levels of disadvantage on each dimension, with a formula for combining them into an overall handicap score. Severity scores measured directly for five scenarios not used to derive the scale weights were compared with those calculated from the formula to validate the model.
RESULTS: The part utilities obtained conformed with the expected hierarchy for each dimension, confirming the validity of the method. The measured severities and those calculated from the formula for the five scenarios used to validate the model agreed closely (Pearson's r = 0.98, p = 0.0009; Kendall's tau = 1.00, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: This interval level handicap measurement scale will be useful in assessing both specific therapies and health services, in clinical trials, in analyses of cost effectiveness, and in assessments of quality assurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10171955      PMCID: PMC1055176          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  4 in total

Review 1.  Measuring handicap: motives, methods, and a model.

Authors:  R H Harwood; S Jitapunkul; E Dickinson; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

2.  Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states.

Authors:  G W Torrance; M H Boyle; S P Horwood
Journal:  Oper Res       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.310

3.  The valuation of states of ill-health: the impact of age and disability.

Authors:  S Ebrahim; S Brittis; A Wu
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus?

Authors:  R Rosser; P Kind
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 7.196

  4 in total
  47 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.

Authors:  M Ryan; S Farrar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

Review 2.  Neurological rehabilitation: from mechanisms to management.

Authors:  A J Thompson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 3.  Measuring handicap: motives, methods, and a model.

Authors:  R H Harwood; S Jitapunkul; E Dickinson; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

4.  Assessing the benefits of health care: how far should we go?

Authors:  M Ryan; P Shackley
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-09

5.  Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

Authors:  T Bedirhan Ustün; Somnath Chatterji; Nenad Kostanjsek; Jürgen Rehm; Cille Kennedy; Joanne Epping-Jordan; Shekhar Saxena; Michael von Korff; Charles Pull
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Initial validation of the Swedish version of the London Handicap Scale.

Authors:  Albert Westergren; Peter Hagell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The incremental shuttle walking test in elderly people with chronic airflow limitation.

Authors:  C A E Dyer; S J Singh; R A Stockley; A J Sinclair; S L Hill
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Should patients participate in clinical decision making? An optimised balance block design controlled study of goal setting in a rehabilitation unit.

Authors:  Rosaline C Holliday; Stefan Cano; Jennifer A Freeman; E Diane Playford
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Are the Domains Considered by ICF Comprehensive Enough to Conceptualize Participation in the Patient with Hand Injuries?

Authors:  Maryam Farzad; Fereydoun Layeghi; Seyyed Ali Hosseini; Khanke Hamidreza; Ali Asgari
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2017-11-29

10.  Short-term efficacy of topical capsaicin therapy in severely affected fibromyalgia patients.

Authors:  Benigno Casanueva; Baltasar Rodero; Covadonga Quintial; Javier Llorca; Miguel A González-Gay
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.