UNLABELLED: Either gated myocardial perfusion SPECT or attenuation-corrected SPECT can be used to improve specificity in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated whether attenuation-noncorrected gating and ungated attenuation correction could improve the diagnostic performance of rest/stress perfusion SPECT in patients having an intermediate pretest likelihood of CAD. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients (29 men, 39 women; mean age, 59 +/- 12 y) with coronary artery stenosis > or =70% (1 vessel, n = 13; 2 vessels, n = 18; 3 vessels, n = 8; normal, n = 29) underwent rest attenuation-corrected 201TI SPECT and dipyridamole stress gated attenuation-corrected 99mTc-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile SPECT with an ADAC vertex camera. Three physicians graded the post-test likelihood of CAD for each arterial territory using a 5-point scale (1, normal; 2, possibly normal; 3, equivocal; 4, possibly abnormal; 5, abnormal). The sensitivity, specificity, and areas under receiver-operating-characteristic curves were compared for each operator by 3 methods: attenuation-noncorrected rest/stress SPECT, gated poststress SPECT plus attenuation-noncorrected rest/stress SPECT, and attenuation-corrected rest/stress SPECT plus gated poststress SPECT plus attenuation-noncorrected rest/stress SPECT. RESULTS: When higher than grade 3 was used as the criterion for CAD, no differences in sensitivity and specificity were found among the 3 methods for each operator. Areas under receiver-operating-characteristic curves for the diagnosis of CAD and stenosis revealed no differences for each modality (P > 0.05 for each comparison). CONCLUSION: In patients with an intermediate risk of CAD, viewing attenuation-noncorrected gated poststress SPECT and ungated attenuation-corrected rest/stress SPECT images did not improve the diagnostic performance for CAD and stenosis.
UNLABELLED: Either gated myocardial perfusion SPECT or attenuation-corrected SPECT can be used to improve specificity in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated whether attenuation-noncorrected gating and ungated attenuation correction could improve the diagnostic performance of rest/stress perfusion SPECT in patients having an intermediate pretest likelihood of CAD. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients (29 men, 39 women; mean age, 59 +/- 12 y) with coronary artery stenosis > or =70% (1 vessel, n = 13; 2 vessels, n = 18; 3 vessels, n = 8; normal, n = 29) underwent rest attenuation-corrected 201TI SPECT and dipyridamole stress gated attenuation-corrected 99mTc-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile SPECT with an ADAC vertex camera. Three physicians graded the post-test likelihood of CAD for each arterial territory using a 5-point scale (1, normal; 2, possibly normal; 3, equivocal; 4, possibly abnormal; 5, abnormal). The sensitivity, specificity, and areas under receiver-operating-characteristic curves were compared for each operator by 3 methods: attenuation-noncorrected rest/stress SPECT, gated poststress SPECT plus attenuation-noncorrected rest/stress SPECT, and attenuation-corrected rest/stress SPECT plus gated poststress SPECT plus attenuation-noncorrected rest/stress SPECT. RESULTS: When higher than grade 3 was used as the criterion for CAD, no differences in sensitivity and specificity were found among the 3 methods for each operator. Areas under receiver-operating-characteristic curves for the diagnosis of CAD and stenosis revealed no differences for each modality (P > 0.05 for each comparison). CONCLUSION: In patients with an intermediate risk of CAD, viewing attenuation-noncorrected gated poststress SPECT and ungated attenuation-corrected rest/stress SPECT images did not improve the diagnostic performance for CAD and stenosis.
Authors: Robert C Hendel; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; E Gordon DePuey; Ernest V Garcia; Timothy M Bateman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Riemer H J A Slart; Tjin H Que; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Lieke Poot; Paul K Blanksma; D Albert Piers; Pieter L Jager Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-08-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Yasmin Masood; Yi-Hwa Liu; Gordon Depuey; Raymond Taillefer; Luis I Araujo; Steven Allen; Dominique Delbeke; Frank Anstett; Aharon Peretz; Mary-Jo Zito; Vera Tsatkin; Frans J Th Wackers Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Alexander G Pitman; Victor Kalff; Bruce Van Every; Borghild Risa; Leighton R Barnden; Michael J Kelly Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Gary V Heller; Timothy M Bateman; Lynne L Johnson; S James Cullom; James A Case; James R Galt; Ernest V Garcia; Keith Haddock; Kelly L Moutray; Carlos Poston; Eli H Botvinick; Matthews B Fish; William P Follansbee; Sean Hayes; Ami E Iskandrian; John J Mahmarian; William Vandecker Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.952