Literature DB >> 7175446

Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons.

W A Roberts, P J Kraemer.   

Abstract

Accuracy of delayed matching to sample was studied in pigeons at different combinations of length of intertrial interval and length of delay. When intertrial interval and delay were varied between sessions in Experiments 1 and 2, accuracy increased monotonically with intertrial interval and decreased monotonically with delay. Evidence was found for constancy of performance at equivalent ratios of intertrial interval to delay, and percentage of correct choices was linearly related to the log of this ratio. In Experiments 3 and 4, intertrial interval was manipulated as a within-sessions variable. In contrast to the effect of this variable when manipulated between sessions, accuracy improved only from the shortest interval to the next shortest interval and remained constant at all longer intervals. In Experiment 4, it was found that performance improved as a direct function of the mean intertrial interval for sessions and that this relation was not affected by the degree of intertrial interval variability within sessions. These findings resemble the effects of temporal variables on autoshaping, and the possibility is discussed that some common processes are involved in delayed matching and autoshaping.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7175446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  19 in total

1.  Generalization of delayed matching to sample following training at different delays.

Authors:  R J Sargisson; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Pigeons may not remember the stimuli that reinforced their recent behavior.

Authors:  D W Schaal; A L Odum; T A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The principal components of response strength.

Authors:  P R Killeen; S S Hall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Writing and overwriting short-term memory.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

5.  Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.

Authors:  D W Schaal; K J Schuh; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Unsignaled delay of reinforcement, relative time, and resistance to change.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Delayed matching-to-sample performance of hens: Effects of sample duration and response requirements during the sample.

Authors:  T M Foster; W Temple; C Mackenzie; L R Demello; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Response-dependent prechoice effects on foraging-related choice.

Authors:  W A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings.

Authors:  J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.