Literature DB >> 16047606

Unsignaled delay of reinforcement, relative time, and resistance to change.

Timothy A Shahan1, Kennon A Lattal.   

Abstract

Two experiments with pigeons examined the effects of unsignaled, nonresetting delays of reinforcement on responding maintained by different reinforcement rates. In Experiment 1, 3-s unsignaled delays were introduced into each component of a multiple variable-interval (VI) 15-s VI 90-s VI 540-s schedule. When considered as a proportion of the preceding immediate reinforcement baseline, responding was decreased similarly for the three multiple-schedule components in both the first six and last six sessions of exposure to the delay. In addition, the relation between response rates and reinforcement rates was altered such that both parameters of the single-response version of the matching law (i.e., k and Re) were decreased. Experiment 2 examined the effects of unsignaled delays ranging from 0.5 s to 8.0 s on responding maintained by a multiple VI 20-s VI 120-s schedule of reinforcement. Response rates in both components increased with brief unsignaled delays and decreased with longer delays. As in Experiment 1, response rates as a proportion of baseline were affected similarly for the two components in both the first six and last six sessions of exposure to the delay. Unlike delays imposed between two stimulus events, the effects of delays between responses and reinforcers do not appear to be attenuated when the average time between reinforcers is longer. In addition, the disruptions produced by unsignaled delays appear to be inconsistent with the general finding that responding maintained by higher rates of reinforcement is less resistant to change.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16047606      PMCID: PMC1193754          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2005.62-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  21 in total

1.  Behavioral momentum and the law of effect.

Authors:  J A Nevin; R C Grace
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.

Authors:  D W Schaal; K J Schuh; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Resistance to change and the law of effect.

Authors:  D N Harper; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Resistance to reinforcement change in multiple and concurrent schedules assessed in transition and at steady state.

Authors:  A P McLean; N M Blampied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Dependency, temporal contiguity, and response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Briefly delayed reinforcement: An interresponse time analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal; D R Ziegler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Tests of behavior momentum in simple and multiple schedules with rats and pigeons.

Authors:  S L Cohen; D S Riley; P A Weigle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Resistance to change of responding maintained by unsignaled delays to reinforcement: a response-bout analysis.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Ryan D Ward; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Operant variability when reinforcement is delayed.

Authors:  Katie Wagner; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  The effects of delayed reinforcement on variability and repetition of response sequences.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Ryan D Ward; Christopher A Barnes; K Anne Burke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A quantitative analysis of the effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on fixed ratio responding in inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.877

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.