Literature DB >> 10733235

Assessment of education and counselling offered by a familial colorectal cancer clinic.

V Collins1, J Halliday, R Warren, R Williamson.   

Abstract

We have evaluated whether or not client expectations, in terms of education and information needs, have been met by a multi-disciplinary familial colorectal cancer clinic. The study used a pre- and post-clinic questionnaire design and 126 (84 women, 42 men) clients of the clinic participated. The most common reason for coming to the clinic is to 'find out whether there is a gene for colorectal cancer in the family', followed by 'to reduce risk for bowel cancer' and 'concern for children's risk'. Clients would have preferred to receive more information before attendance at the clinic to help with preparation. Information given during the clinic increased knowledge of bowel cancer genetics and had a positive effect on the accuracy of some clients' perceptions of their risk of developing cancer. In multivariate analysis, higher risk perceptions, higher education level and greater baseline knowledge predicted post-clinic knowledge of bowel cancer genetics and an increase in knowledge. Client reports of the presence of a genetic counsellor or medical geneticist in the session also predicted post-clinic knowledge and an increase in knowledge. Most participants felt they received enough information during the clinic session on various aspects of familial colorectal cancer, but the desire for more written information on prevention, including lifestyle actions, was expressed by many.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10733235     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.570107.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  13 in total

1.  Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  C Phelps; F Wood; P Bennett; K Brain; J Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Barriers to and motivations for physician referral of patients to cancer genetics clinics.

Authors:  Carrie F Prochniak; Lisa J Martin; Erin M Miller; Sara C Knapke
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Referrals of patients to colorectal cancer genetics services in south-east Scotland.

Authors:  Susan Holloway; Mary Porteous; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Robert Rush; Sally Appleton; Dermot Gorman; Harry Campbell
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Codori; Tracy Waldeck; Gloria M Petersen; Diana Miglioretti; Jill D Trimbath; Miriam A Tillery
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A survey of patients' experiences with the cancer genetic counseling process: recommendations for cancer genetics programs.

Authors:  Dana T Kausmeyer; Eugene J Lengerich; Brenda C Kluhsman; Dorothy Morrone; Gregory R Harper; Maria J Baker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  What information do cancer genetic counselees prioritize?

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Claudia Lampic; Charlotta Ingvoldstad; Marie Stenmark Askmalm; Chathrine Bjorvatn; Richard Rosenquist; Karin Nordin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Differences in Cancer Phenotypes Among Frequent CHEK2 Variants and Implications for Clinical Care-Checking CHEK2.

Authors:  Brittany L Bychkovsky; Nihat B Agaoglu; Carolyn Horton; Jing Zhou; Amal Yussuf; Parichehr Hemyari; Marcy E Richardson; Colin Young; Holly LaDuca; Deborah L McGuinness; Rochelle Scheib; Judy E Garber; Huma Q Rana
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 33.006

8.  Cancer genetic predisposition: information needs of patients irrespective of risk level.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Julie Werrett; Lucy Burgess; Cyril Chapman; Collette Clifford
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  What motivates interest in attending a familial cancer genetics clinic?

Authors:  L Fraser; S Bramald; C Chapman; C Chu; V Cornelius; F Douglas; A Lucassen; A Nehammer; S Sutton; M Trivella; S Hodgson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.