Literature DB >> 17106634

A survey of patients' experiences with the cancer genetic counseling process: recommendations for cancer genetics programs.

Dana T Kausmeyer1, Eugene J Lengerich, Brenda C Kluhsman, Dorothy Morrone, Gregory R Harper, Maria J Baker.   

Abstract

In order to promote ongoing quality improvement of not only the Penn State Cancer Genetics Program, but also other cancer risk assessment programs throughout the country, we developed, piloted and conducted a survey to explore patient expectations, experiences, and satisfaction with the cancer genetic counseling process. The comprehensive survey was mailed to 340 eligible patients, 156 (45.9%) of whom returned the completed survey within the allotted time. Responses to closed-ended questions were tallied and open-ended questions were content analyzed. Major findings show that: (1) Patients were seeking cancer-related information and support throughout the cancer risk assessment process and were interested in participating in available research studies; (2) The setting in which patients are seen for cancer risk assessment may pose potential emotional ramifications; (3) Misperceptions regarding insurance discrimination and lack of insurance coverage persist; (4) Patients view the genetic counselor as responsible for updating them about new discoveries. Specific recommendations for cancer genetics programs are included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106634     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9039-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  14 in total

1.  Emerging quality improvement measures in genetic counseling.

Authors:  D H Lea
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Cancer genetic clinics: why do women who already have cancer attend?

Authors:  C Julian-Reynier; F Eisinger; F Chabal; Y Aurran; Y J Bignon; C Noguès; M Machelard; C Maugard; P Vennin; H Sobol
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Psychosocial aspects of cancer genetics: women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  K M Kash; K Ortega-Verdejo; M K Dabney; J C Holland; D G Miller; M P Osborne
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-06

4.  Assessment of education and counselling offered by a familial colorectal cancer clinic.

Authors:  V Collins; J Halliday; R Warren; R Williamson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: effects on duration and content of counseling sessions.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Lois C Friedman; Gregory R Harper; Wendy S Rubinstein; June A Peters; David T Mauger
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Psychosocial impact of genetic testing in familial medullary-thyroid carcinoma: a multicentric pilot-evaluation.

Authors:  G Freyer; A Dazord; M Schlumberger; B Conte-Devolx; B Ligneau; V Trillet-Lenoir; G M Lenoir
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Factors influencing patients' decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services.

Authors:  K P Geer; M E Ropka; W F Cohn; S M Jones; S Miesfeldt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Addressing the support needs of women at high risk for breast cancer: evidence-based care by advanced practice nurses.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Cathy DeGrasse; Lisa Johnston
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Gregory R Harper; Lois C Friedman; Wendy S Rubinstein; David T Mauger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Duty to re-contact.

Authors:  K Hirschhorn; L D Fleisher; L Godmilow; R R Howell; R R Lebel; E R McCabe; M J McGinniss; A Milunsky; M Z Pelias; R E Pyeritz; E Sujansky; B H Thompson; R E Zinberg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  16 in total

1.  Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Allison W Kurian; Monica Morrow; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Assessment of clinical practices among cancer genetic counselors.

Authors:  Deborah Wham; Thuy Vu; Gayun Chan-Smutko; Christine Kobelka; Diana Urbauer; Brandie Heald
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Recontacting or not recontacting? A survey of current practices in clinical genetics centres in Europe.

Authors:  Fabio Sirchia; Daniele Carrieri; Sandi Dheensa; Caroline Benjamin; Hülya Kayserili; Christophe Cordier; Carla G van El; Peter D Turnpenny; Bela Melegh; Álvaro Mendes; Tanya F Halbersma-Konings; Irene M van Langen; Anneke M Lucassen; Angus J Clarke; Francesca Forzano; Susan E Kelly
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Communication about Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Perspective of Filipino Families.

Authors:  Peter James B Abad; Cora A Anonuevo; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Lorna R Abad; Carmencita D Padilla; Mercy Y Laurino
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The Long and Short of Genetic Counseling Summary Letters: A Case-control Study.

Authors:  J Roggenbuck; R Temme; D Pond; J Baker; K Jarvis; M Liu; S Dugan; N J Mendelsohn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  "The bigger the network the bigger the bowl of cherries...": exploring the acceptability of, and preferences for, an ongoing support network for known BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lisa Hughes; Ceri Phelps
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Assessment of Current Genetic Counselor Practices in Post-Visit Written Communications to Patients.

Authors:  Emily VandenBoom; Angela M Trepanier; Erin P Carmany
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Daniele Carrieri; Anneke M Lucassen; Angus J Clarke; Sandi Dheensa; Shane Doheny; Peter D Turnpenny; Susan E Kelly
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Mirjam Plantinga; Erwin Birnie; Marian A Verkerk; Anneke M Lucassen; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M Van Langen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.