Literature DB >> 21993709

What information do cancer genetic counselees prioritize?

Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai1, Claudia Lampic, Charlotta Ingvoldstad, Marie Stenmark Askmalm, Chathrine Bjorvatn, Richard Rosenquist, Karin Nordin.   

Abstract

This study explored the informational needs of individuals attending genetic counseling for hereditary cancer, using a free-choice and a forced choice method. Prior to the consultation the informational needs of 334 counselees from Sweden and Norway were assessed by the QUOTE-gene (ca) questionnaire and by a study specific forced choice method, using Q-methodology. Questionnaire responses indicated that counselees' major concerns pertained to the need to be taken seriously, to be provided with sufficient risk estimation and medical/genetic information and to be involved in the decision making process. Furthermore, prior to counseling, counselees noted that the counselors' consideration and skillfulness were also extremely important. Analysis of the Q-sorting results revealed that counselees' needs could be assigned to one of five groups: the "need for facts; caring communication and medical information; information and support in communicating the genetic information to others; practical care and practical/medical information". Particularly noteworthy, counselees with varying backgrounds characteristics prioritized different needs. Cancer genetic counselees probably have different needs due to their medical and demographic background when attending genetic counseling. Addressing counselees' specific concerns more sufficiently and thereby increasing the overall effectiveness of the counseling session requires increased insight into individual needs, by for instance, utilizing screening methods such as QUOTE-gene (ca) prior to the counseling session.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993709     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9409-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  23 in total

1.  The subjective experience of partnership love: a Q Methodological study.

Authors:  Simon Watts; Paul Stenner
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-03

2.  Psychosocial impact of the lack of information given at referral about familial risk for cancer.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Julie Werrett; Lucy Burgess; Collette Clifford
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Assessment of education and counselling offered by a familial colorectal cancer clinic.

Authors:  V Collins; J Halliday; R Warren; R Williamson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 4.  Visit-specific expectations and patient-centered outcomes: a literature review.

Authors:  J K Rao; M Weinberger; K Kroenke
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

5.  Do unmet expectations for specific tests, referrals, and new medications reduce patients' satisfaction?

Authors:  B Mitchell Peck; Peter A Ubel; Debra L Roter; Susan Dorr Goold; David A Asch; Amy S Jeffreys; Steven C Grambow; James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Development of E-info gene(ca): a website providing computer-tailored information and question prompt prior to breast cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Roel Otten; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Patient-physician communication during oncology consultations.

Authors:  Hanna Fagerlind; Asa Kettis Lindblad; Ida Bergström; Magdalena Nilsson; Gisela Nauclér; Bengt Glimelius; Lena Ring
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 8.  Tailored information about cancer risk and screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Margreet G E M Ausems; Jozien M Bensing; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-04-18

9.  Communication in cancer genetic counselling: does it reflect counselees' previsit needs and preferences?

Authors:  A H Pieterse; A M van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems; F A Beemer; J M Bensing
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Patient satisfaction with two different models of cancer genetic services in south-east Scotland.

Authors:  S Holloway; M Porteous; R Cetnarskyj; E Anderson; R Rush; A Fry; D Gorman; M Steel; H Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Factors affecting breast cancer patients' need for genetic risk information: From information insufficiency to information need.

Authors:  Soo Jung Hong; Barbara Biesecker; Jennifer Ivanovich; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Design and Feasibility of an Intervention to Support Cancer Genetic Counselees in Informing their At-Risk Relatives.

Authors:  Eveline de Geus; Willem Eijzenga; Fred H Menko; Rolf H Sijmons; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Cora M Aalfs; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research.

Authors:  Kate Churruca; Kristiana Ludlow; Wendy Wu; Kate Gibbons; Hoa Mi Nguyen; Louise A Ellis; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Informing relatives about their hereditary or familial cancer risk: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eveline de Geus; Cora M Aalfs; Mathilde G E Verdam; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Referral to cancer genetic counseling: do migrant status and patients' educational background matter?

Authors:  J A M van der Giessen; E van Riel; M E Velthuizen; A M van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-09-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.