Literature DB >> 10728237

An assessment of the use and impact of ancillary prenatal care services to Medicaid women in managed care.

G R Alexander1, T C Hulsey, K Foley, E Keller, K Cairns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Managed care plans under Medicaid are becoming a usual source of care for low-income pregnant women. This study describes an ancillary prenatal care service intervention developed by one managed care organization (MCO) for Medicaid-enrolled women, assesses the extent to which the intervention services were used, and appraises the influence of the intervention on prenatal care participation.
METHOD: There were 226 intervention and 258 control women with a single live birth delivered between 28 and 44 weeks gestation who (1) were enrolled in the MCO's Medicaid program, (2) were high-risk based on a prenatal risk assessment, and (3) started prenatal care prior to 26 weeks gestation. Less than adequate and intensive prenatal care utilization were chosen as intervention outcomes measures.
RESULTS: Family planning, a 2-month postpartum baby visit, a maternal postpartum visit, and a WIC (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children) referral were among the most self-selected intervention services for this population; home health aide and breast-feeding support were the least requested services. Over 90% of those needing family planning or breast-feeding services received the services, while over 20% of the intervention group refused child care, food assistance and family violence referrals, and home health aide and smoking cessation services. The intervention group had a significantly lower risk of less than adequate utilization of prenatal care (OR = .32; 95% CI: 0.17-0.60) and was more likely to have an intensive number of prenatal care visits (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.05-2.48).
CONCLUSIONS: The ability of managed care organizations to provide ongoing prenatal care to Medicaid populations in a cost-effective manner depends partly on their development of packages of prenatal services that foster positive preventive health care utilization behaviors and good pregnancy outcomes. The results of this project suggest that the intervention was beneficial in the area of improving utilization of prenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10728237     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026204527786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  27 in total

1.  Expanding Medicaid coverage for pregnant women: estimates of the impact and cost.

Authors:  A Torres; A M Kenney
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb

2.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Improving pregnancy outcomes: public versus private care for urban, low-income women.

Authors:  A Handler; D Rosenberg
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Source of prenatal care and infant birth weight: the case of a North Carolina county.

Authors:  P A Buescher; C Smith; J L Holliday; R H Levine
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Seasonal variation in adolescent conceptions, induced abortions, and late initiation of prenatal care.

Authors:  D J Petersen; G R Alexander
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  A comparison of low birth weight among Medicaid patients of public health departments and other providers of prenatal care in North Carolina and Kentucky.

Authors:  P A Buescher; N I Ward
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  The association between adequacy of prenatal care utilization and subsequent pediatric care utilization in the United States.

Authors:  M D Kogan; G R Alexander; B W Jack; M C Allen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Risk, antepartum care, and outcome: impact of a maternity and infant care project.

Authors:  R J Sokol; R B Woolf; M G Rosen; K Weingarden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Infant health care utilization predicted by pattern of prenatal care.

Authors:  A M Butz; A Funkhouser; L Caleb; B J Rosenstein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  The role of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight.

Authors:  G R Alexander; C C Korenbrot
Journal:  Future Child       Date:  1995
View more
  5 in total

1.  Health promotion and psychosocial services and women's assessments of interpersonal prenatal care in Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  Carol C Korenbrot; Sabrina T Wong; Anita L Stewart
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

2.  Trends and racial differences in birth weight and related survival.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M E Tompkins; M C Allen; T C Hulsey
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-06

3.  A performance indicator of psychosocial services in enhanced prenatal care of Medicaid-eligible women.

Authors:  D S Wilkinson; C C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

4.  A Call to Revisit the Prenatal Period as a Focus for Action Within the Reproductive and Perinatal Care Continuum.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kay Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

5.  Who participates in state sponsored Medicaid enhanced prenatal services?

Authors:  Lee Anne Roman; Cristian I Meghea; Jennifer E Raffo; H Lynette Biery; Shelby Berkowitz Chartkoff; Qi Zhu; Susan M Moran; Wm Thomas Summerfelt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-12-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.